But if they were already sunk to a state of degradation,
were they punished when the offense was committed,
if indeed it could be termed an offense to engage with
France combating for liberty against the combined
despots of Europe."[1] Washington and his Cabinet
took great interest in the case; Hamilton drafted an
indictment and aided in the trial; Attorney-General
Randolph argued the case with the United States Attorney William Rawle. For the prisoner, Peter S. Duponceau, Jared Ingersoll and Thomas Sergeant appeared. Judge Wilson (with whom Judge Iredell and
District Judge Peters also sat) charged the jury with
great positiveness that Henfield's act, if proved, was
punishable in the Federal Court under the law of nations and treaties of the United States, even though
Congress had enacted no statute making the act a crime. "This is a case of first importance," said Judge
Wilson to the jury. "Upon your verdict the interests of four millions of your fellow citizens may be said to depend. As a citizen of the United States, the defendant was bound to keep the peace in regard to all
nations with whom we are at peace. This is the law
of nations," and he pointed out that if citizens could
take part in the war on one side, they might on both
sides, and that their friends who stayed behind also
would not keep the peace, "and so civil war may result."
In spite of this charge, and the certainty of the evidence,
the jury acquitted Henfield "amidst the acclamations
of their fellow citizens."[2] While the result of the pros-
- ↑ Life of Washington (1807), by John Marshall, II, 273.
- ↑ "It is said the juryman that opposed the acquittal of Gideon Henfield upon his final compliance informed the Bench that he was induced to the verdict because he heard threats made out of doors against anyone who should oppose the acquittal." Massachusetts Mercury, Aug. 9, 1798. The National Gazette said, Aug. 17, 1793: "The toast of the day in all republican circles at Boston is, 'the virtuous and independent jury of Pennsylvania who acquitted Henfield.'" For account of the trial, see General Advertiser, July 80, 81, Aug. 3, 1793; American Daily Adsertiser, July 3, Aug. 8, 19, 1793; National Gazette, Aug. 8, 1793; The Diary or