Page:The Surgical Instruments of the Hindus Vol 1.djvu/16

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
viii
PREFACE.

Now it may be asked why the Science and Art of Surgery, which was successfully practised in Ancient India, is so much neglected by the present generation of Vaids. So let us consider the causes that led to the downfall of Hindu Surgery:

1. The Hindus from a very early period have given up the dissection of human bodies—the only trustworthy method of acquiring anatomical knowledge—merely because it may occasion ceremonial uncleanliness. The Ancient Hindus were, however, free from such prejudices. Manu lays down that mere bathing will purify a Brahman who has touched a corpse,[1] whilst stroking a cow or looking at the Sun, having only sprinkled his mouth with water will remove the defilement due to touching a dead bone.[2] But even in the Manusaṁhitā, we can trace the decline of Hindu surgery, and his law forbidding any one from eating food from the hands of a doctor evidently refers to a surgeon.[3]

2. The interference of the priests in India, as in Europe played an important part. They began to cure diseases by spells, charms, texts and drugs; and temples have served as consulting rooms for the treatment as much of the diseases

  1. दिवाकीर्त्तिमुदक्यां च पतितं सूतिकां तथा।
    शवं तत्स्पृष्टिनं चैव स्पृष्ट्वा स्नानेन शुध्यति॥

    The Institutes of Manu, Ch. V, 85.
  2. नारं स्पृष्ट्वास्थि सस्नेहं स्नात्वा विप्रो विशुध्यति।
    आचम्यैव तु निस्नेहं गामालभ्यार्कमीक्ष्यवा॥

    Ibid, Ch. V, 87.
  3. Ibid, Ch. III, 152; Ch. IV, vs. 212 and 220.