Page:The Theatre of the Greeks, a Treatise on the History and Exhibition of the Greek Drama, with Various Supplements.djvu/137

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

SOPHOCLES. 119 sparingly, adopted, arose from his having given to each of the plays in his Trilogies an individual completeness which the consti- tuent parts of an .Eschylean Trilogy did not possess. We shall de- rive some further reasons for believing this from a consideration of the general principles which guided the art of Sophocles. That he did act upon general principles is sufficiently proved, by the fact that he wrote a book on the dramatic chorus. The ob- jection, which (according to Chamteleon) he made to ^schylus, that even when his poetry was what it ought to be, it was so only by accident^, is just such a remark as a finished artist would make to a self-taught genius. But we might conclude, without any ex- trinsic authority, from a moderate acquaintance with his remaining Tragedies, that he is never beautiful or sublime, without intending to be so : we see that he has a complete apprehension of the proper means of arriving at the objects of tragical imitation : he feels that his success depends not upon his subject, but upon himself; he has the faculty of making with right reason;" in short, he is an artist in the strictest sense of the word^. "Sophocles," says one who has often more than guessed at truth, "is the summit of Greek art; but one must have scaled many a steep before one can estimate his height : it is because of his classical perfection that he has gene- rally been the least admired of the great ancient poets ; for little of his beauty is perceptible to a mind that is not thoroughly princi- pled and imbued with the spirit of antiquity 3." The ancients themselves fully appreciated Sophocles: his great contemporary Aristophanes will not expose ^schylus to the risk of a contest with a man to whom he has voluntarily given up a part of the tragic throne, and to Avhom he delegates his authority when he returns to the upper world"*: his numerous victories and the im- provements which ^Eschylus found it necessary to borrow from him, are all so many proofs of the estimation in which he was held by his countrymen: but it is to be feared that few, if any, of his modern readers, will ever be able to divest themselves completely of all their modern associations, and thus set a just value upon 1 See Athen. i. 22, X. 428, quoted in the sect, on .Eschylus. 2 Aristot. Eth. Nicom. vi, p. 11 40, 1. 10, Bekker : Icrrt Se Tix^n Trdcra wepi yeveaiv Kal rb Tex,vd^€Lu, Kal deojpelv, Sttws Blv yevrjrai tl tQiv iv8€xo/J.^v(jJv /cat elvac Kal /jlt] elvai Kal (5v 7) dpxh e" t(^ ttolovvtl dXd /Utj Iv ry iroLOV/xeuu}. i] /neu ofv rex"^ uiffTep eiprjrai e^ts res fjL€Td Xoyov iroi.r]TiKr] ian. 3 Gmsses at Truth, Vol. i. p. 267. Comp. Miillcr, Hist. Lit. (h c. xxiv. § 13.

  • Comp. Aristoph. Ran, 790, 15 15.