Page:The Theatre of the Greeks, a Treatise on the History and Exhibition of the Greek Drama, with Various Supplements.djvu/437

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
OF THE GREEK DRAMATISTS.
411

13. In cases where the augment falls as in (Symbol missingGreek characters) or (Symbol missingGreek characters), or where, as in (Symbol missingGreek characters) and (Symbol missingGreek characters), the short vowel closes the first part of a composite word, the prolongation of that syllable in Euripides, though not altogether avoided, is yet exceedingly rare. (R. P. ad Orest. 64).

14. One great cause of the many mistakes about syllabic quantity should seem to be involved in that false position of S. Clarke's (ad Il. B. 537), that a short vowel preceding any two consonants with which a syllable can be commenced may form a short syllable. Nothing was ever more unluckily asserted, or more pregnant with confusion and error.

15. To the perspicacity and acuteness of Dawes (M. C. pp. 90, 1, 196, 146, 7) we are indebted for the first clear statement of the principal points in this department of prosody : to the deliberate and masterly judgment of Porson (ad Orest. 64, and elsewhere) we owe whatever else is correctly and certainly known. 16. Some little things, however, may serve to show that an English ear, especially on a sudden appeal, is no very competent judge of Attic correptions, so called.

For instance, in the following lines :

Phœn. 1444. (Symbol missingGreek characters)

Alc. 434. (Symbol missingGreek characters)

it is not from any practice of our own, certainly, that we should pronounce the words (Symbol missingGreek characters) and (Symbol missingGreek characters)with precision and facility in that very way.

17. So, too, if (Symbol missingGreek characters) and (Symbol missingGreek characters) were on a sudden proposed as to the shortening of the first syllable in each, it might seem to an English ear just as improbable in the noun as in the verb; although in Athenian utterance we know very well the fact was quite otherwise.

Toup (vid. Emendd. Vol. i. 114, 5; iv. 441) maintained in his day (what is now called) the permissiveness of (Symbol missingGreek characters) and actually, on that ground, suggested the following as an emendatien of a passage in Sophocles, for (Symbol missingGreek characters) or(Symbol missingGreek characters):

Elect. 21, 2 (Symbol missingGreek characters),

(where (Symbol missingGreek characters), of course, is right enough, being pronounced (Symbol missingGreek characters)). Since Person's delicate correction of that error (u. s. p. 441) no argument has been advanced in its defence. And yet, {{subst:a` priori why should not (Symbol missingGreek characters) be permissive, as well as Op., for instance?" The consonants (Symbol missingGreek characters) can begin a word ; why not commence a separate syllable ? How can (Symbol missingGreek characters) commence a syllable, when notoriously it cannot begin a word?"