some one who wants to talk to him about the Norcross murder.
“You the editor? . . . All right. . . . I am the man who killed old Norcross . . . Wait! Hold the wire; I’m not the usual crank . . . Oh, there isn’t the slightest danger. I’ve just been discussing it with a detective friend of mine. I killed the old man at 2:30 a. m. two weeks ago to-morrow. . . . Have a drink with you? Now, hadn’t you better leave that kind of talk to your funny man? Can’t you tell whether a man’s guying you or whether you’re being offered the biggest scoop your dull dishrag of a paper ever had? . . . Well, that’s so; it’s a bobtail scoop—but you can hardly expect me to phone in my name and address. . . . Why? Oh, because I heard you make a specialty of solving mysterious crimes that stump the police . . . No, that’s not all. I want to tell you that your rotten, lying, penny sheet is of no more use in tracking an intelligent murderer or highwayman than a blind poodle would be. . . . What? . . . Oh, no, this isn’t a rival newspaper office; you’re getting it straight. I did the Norcross job, and I’ve got the jewels in my suit case at—‘the name of the hotel could not be learned’—you recognize that phrase, don’t you? I thought so. You’ve used it often enough. Kind of rattles you, doesn’t it, to have the mysterious villain call up your great, big, all-powerful organ of right and justice
[194]
