Originating in the woollen band worn by the Spartan virgin[1]—a garment removed for the first time by the husband on the wedding night—these Girdles of Chastity, with their padlocks and keys, were undoubtedly in use in the fourteenth or fifteenth century, and in use for an unmistakable purpose. "The first to employ this apparatus," says Dr. Jacobus X—— (Ethnology of the Sixth Sense: Charles Carrington: Paris, 1899), "was Francis of Tarrara, Provost of Padua in the fourteenth century. It was a belt having a central piece made of ivory, with a barbed narrow slit down the middle, which was passed between the legs and fixed there by lock and key. A specimen of this safety apparatus is to be seen actually at the Musee de Cluny in Paris."
Dr. Caufeynon, the great authority on the subject, believes, however, that these girdles only date from the Renaissance.[2] In his remarkable
- ↑ Brantome, apparently, had a poor opinion of Spartan virginity. "What kind of virtue was it?" he asks. (Lives of Fair and Gallant Ladies.) "Why! on their solemn feast-days the Spartan maids were used to sing and dance in public stark naked with the lads, and even wrestle in the open market place, the which however was done in all honesty and good faith, so History saith. But what sort of honesty and purity was this, we may well ask, to look on at these pretty maids so performing publicly? Honesty was it never a whit, but pleasure in the sight of them, and especially of their bodily movements and dancing postures, and above all in their wrestling; and chiefest of all when they came to fall one atop of the other, as they say in Latin: 'She underneath, he atop; he underneath, she atop.' You will never persuade me 'twas all honesty and purity herein with these Spartan maidens. I ween there is never chastity so chaste that would not have been shaken thereby, or that, so making in public and by day these feint assaults, they did not presently in privity and by night and on assignation proceed to greater combats and night attacks."
- ↑ Havelock Ellis, op. cit., vol.6: Sex in Relation to Society., p. 163.
36
