longer unclaimed, and to attribute to them an entirely different sense from that which they have hitherto had means to misuse them, means to introduce a licence in accordance with which every one might use any word in any sense he chose, and thus endless confusion would necessarily arise. Locke has already shown at length that most disagreements in philosophy arise from a false use of words. For the sake of illustration just glance for a moment at the shameful misuse which philosophers destitute of thoughts make at the present day of the words substance, consciousness, truth, and many others. Moreover, the utterances and explanations concerning reason of all philosophers of all ages, with the exception of the most modern, agree no less with my explanation of it than the conceptions which prevail among all nations of that prerogative of man. Observe what Plato, in the fourth book of the Republic, and in innumerable scattered passages, calls the (Greek characters), or (
Greek characters), what Cicero says (De Nat. Deor., iii. 26-31), what Leibnitz and Locke say upon this in the passages already quoted in the first book. There would be no end to the quotations here if one sought to show how all philosophers before Kant have spoken of reason in general in my sense, although they did not know how to explain its nature with complete definiteness and distinctness by reducing it to one point. What was understood by reason shortly before Kant's appearance is shown in general by two essays of Sulzer in the first volume of his miscellaneous philosophical writings, the one entitled "Analysis of the Conception of Reason," the other, "On the Reciprocal Influence of Reason and Language." If, on the other hand, we read how reason is spoken about in the most recent times, through the influence of the Kantian error, which after him increased like an avalanche, we are obliged to assume that the whole of the wise men of antiquity, and also all philosophers before Kant, had absolutely no reason at all; for the immediate perceptions, intuitions, apprehensions, presentiments of the
Page:The World as Will and Idea - Schopenhauer, tr. Haldane and Kemp - Volume 2.djvu/151
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
CRITICISM OF THE KANTIAN PHILOSOPHY.
141
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/The_World_as_Will_and_Idea_-_Schopenhauer%2C_tr._Haldane_and_Kemp_-_Volume_2.djvu/page151-1024px-The_World_as_Will_and_Idea_-_Schopenhauer%2C_tr._Haldane_and_Kemp_-_Volume_2.djvu.jpg)