Page:The age of Justinian and Theodora (Volume 2).djvu/331

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

Besides being an Origenist, Theodore was a temperate Monophysite;[1] and he now persuaded the Emperor that a qualified condemnation of the defunct prelates would purge the Council of every blemish and win for it the acceptance of all of his creed. Justinian again applied himself to his studies, and soon convinced himself that the theologians indicated had been tainted with flagrant impiety; upon which he published an edict wherein their respective errors were reprobated in three sections.[2] In the East but little commotion was occasioned by this document, as the objections were familiar to those accustomed to read the Greek Fathers, but among the Latins the Church was agitated violently because nothing was comprehended[3] except that the Council of Chalcedon, the decisions of which had been dictated by Pope Leo, was convicted of fallacy. On that side of the Empire, therefore, controversy and stubborn resistance was at once manifested against the Emperor's proscription of the "Three Chapters," the title conveniently bestowed on the matters in dispute.[4]

Justinian, as usual, was determined to carry his point; and he now concluded that the most effective means of attaining his end was to procure a Papal ordinance in confirmation of his own edict. But Vigilius at Rome was beyond the power of persuasion, and might soon not be

  • [Footnote: arrived first at the Council of Ephesus (431), and "filled their ears with

poison and blinded their eyes." Hence Nestorius was condemned without "judgment or question." This document was read and passed at Chalcedon; Concil., vii, 242; xi, 297; cf. Evagrius, ii, 18.]

  1. Liberatus (24) says he was an Acephalus, the only authority.
  2. Facundus, Defens., ii, 3; iv, 4.
  3. Pope Vigilius himself confesses that he did not understand Greek; Concil., ix, 98.
  4. Facundus, Contr. Mocianum; Liberatus, 24, etc.