Page:The battle of the books - Guthkelch - 1908.djvu/58

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
l
INTRODUCTION

Some interest attaches to Wotton's conjectures at the authorship of the Tale of a Tub.[1] In one place[2] he says that 'a brother [he means 'cousin'J of Dr Swift's is publicly reported to have been the editor at least, if not the author [of the Tale of a Tub]': in another[3] he says that Mr Swift [i.e. Thomas Swift] is under great obligations to clear himself from the imputation of having written the book. 'The world besides (he continues) will think it odd that a man should in a dedication play upon that great man, to whom he is more obliged than to any other man now living; for it was at Sir William Temple's request, that my Lord Somers, then Lord-Keeper of the Great-Seal of England, gave Mr Swift a very good benefice in one of the most delicious parts of one of the pleasantest counties of England. It is publicly reported that he wrote this book: it is a story which, . . . I neither made, nor spread; for it has been long as public as it can well be. The injury done to religion, that any of its ministers should lie under

  1. His remarks are intended to include the Battle of the Books.
  2. p. 519.
  3. p. 539.