Page:The general principles of constitutional law in the United States of America.djvu/65

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
RISE OF THE AMERICAN UNION.
7

The Petition of Right.[1]—By this petition it was prayed, among other things, "that no man be compelled to make or yield any gift, loan, benevolence, tax, or such like charge, without common consent by act of Parliament; that none be called upon to make answer for refusal so to do; that freemen be imprisoned or disseized only by the law of the land, or by due process of law, and not by the king's special command without any charge." In the next reign was enacted

The Habeas Corpus Act,[2] the purpose of which was to give speedy relief from all unlawful imprisonments, and to enforce upon judicial and other officers the duty of deliverance. The fourth of the great charters of English constitutional liberty was

The Bill of Rights,[3] which embodied in statutory form the principles enumerated in the Declaration of Rights presented by the Convention Parliament to the sovereigns called by that body to the throne on the Revolution of 1688. The purpose of this act was to enumerate and reaffirm such rights of the people as the House of Stuart in any of its reigning representatives had set aside, encroached upon, or ignored.

The Common Law.—The charters above mentioned declared general principles, but the common law was the expositor of these, and the extent of the protection they should give could only be determined by its rules. That law was the growth of many centuries; its maxims were those of a sturdy and independent race of men, who were accustomed in an unusual degree to freedom of thought and action, and to a share in the administration of public affairs.[4] So far as they declared individual rights, they were a part of the constitution of the realm, and of that "law of the land" the benefit of which was promised by

  1. 3 Ch. I., ch. 1 (1628).
  2. 31 Ch. II., ch.2 (1679).
  3. 1 Wm. & Mary, Ses. 2, ch. 2 (1689).
  4. Cooley, Const. Lim., 6th ed., p. 33. Van Ness v. Pacard. 2 Pet 137, 144.