Page:The geography of Strabo (1854) Volume 1.djvu/134

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

120 STRABO. BOOK II. who tell us that in India the two Bears are observed to set, how can it be said that not a single person, not even Eratos- thenes, has informed us of any thing concerning the clima of India? This is itself information on that point. If, how- ever, he has not confirmed this statement, let him be exoner- ated from the error. Certain it is he never did confirm the statement. Only when Deimachus affirmed that there was no place in India from which the two Bears might be seen to set, or the shadows fall both ways, as Megasthenes had asserted, Eratosthenes thereupon taxed him with ignorance, regard- ing as absolutely false this two-fold assertion, one half of which, namely, that concerning the shadows not falling both ways, Hipparchus himself acknowledged to be false ; for if the southern extremity of India were not under the same parallel as Meroe, still Hipparchus appears to have considered it south of Syene. 21. In the instances which follow, Hipparchus, treating of these subjects, either asserts things similar to those which we have already refuted, or takes for granted matters which are not so, or draws improper sequences. For instance, from the computation [of Eratosthenes] that the distance from Baby- lon to Thapsacus 1 is 4800 stadia, and thence northward to the mountains of Armenia 2 2100 stadia more, it does not fol- low that, starting from the meridian of that city, the distance to the northern mountains is above 6000 stadia. Besides, Eratosthenes never says that the distance from Thapsacus to these mountains is 2100 stadia, but that a part thereof has never yet been measured ; so that this argument [of Hippar- chus], founded on a false hypothesis, amounts to nothing. Nor did Eratosthenes ever assert that Thapsacus lies more than 4500 stadia north of Babylon. 22. Again, Hipparchus, ever anxious to defend the [accu- racy of the] ancient charts, instead of fairly stating the words of Eratosthenes concerning his third section of the habitable earth, wilfully makes him the author of an assertion easy of disproof. For Eratosthenes, following the opinion we before mentioned, that a line drawn from the Pillars of Hercules across the Mediterranean, and the length of the Taurus, would 1 Now Ruins, near Jerobolos, or Jerabees, the ancient Etiropus ; not Deer or Deir. 2 Probably the present Barena, a branch of the Taurus.