Page:The invasion of the Crimea Vol. 8.djvu/336

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

304 OPINIONS ON CANROBERT EXPRESSED CHAP. XI. Opinions of Canrobert expressed by men in authority. 22d of April, and to a victorious sense of its power on the 1st of May when Pelissier, over- coming the resistance of his then Chief, attacked, and carried, and conquered the Sousdal Counter- guard. It was therefore in spite of Canrobert, and by the happily over-dominant energy of his irrepressible subordinate, that the French army, proudly emerging from out of that state of de- pression to which the ' mission ' had lowered it, stood ready and eager for action. The men in authority were swift, I observe, to appreciate the sacrifice implied in General Can- robert's resignation; yet, even whilst expressing this sentiment, they did not conceal their desire to see the French army commanded by a more determined Chief. ' General Canrobert,' wrote Marshal Vaillant, 'is a noble heart.' ... 'I ' hope we are now going to advance more reso- ' lutely.'* Lord Panmure, after speaking of Canrobert's 1 vacillation and indecision of character,' writes : ' I am riot sorry that he no longer fills a position ' to the responsibility of which he appears to ' have been quite unequal. Possessing in the ' most eminent degree all the qualities of courage ' and zeal which constitute the brave soldier, he did not possess those comprehensive views, nor ' that moral courage in Council, which mark a ' sagacious and resolute general.' t General Kiel was not silent. Referring to the

  • To Niel. Quoted, Rousset, vol. ii. p. 177.

+ Despatch to Lord Raglan, 21st May 1855.