of propagation of the surface seismic waves through continents with those through oceanic areas, and found the following values:—
1.—OCEANS. | ||||||
Number. | ||||||
Californian | Earthquake, | April 18, 1906 | v. = | 3.847±0.045 | km./sec. | 9 |
Columbian | Earthquake,„ | January 31, 1906 | 3.806±0.046 | km./sec.„ | 18 | |
Honduras | Earthquake,„ | July 1, 1907 | 3.941±0.022 | km./sec.„ | 20 | |
Nicaraguan | Earthquake,„ | December 30, 1907 | 3.916±0.029 | km./sec.„ | 22 | |
2.—CONTINENTS. | ||||||
Californian | Earthquake, | April 18, 1906 | v. = | 3.770±0.104 | km./sec. | 5 |
Philippine | Islands, I „ | April 18, 1907 | 3.765±0.045 | km./sec.„ | 30 | |
Philippine„ | Islands„II „ | April 18, 1907 | 3.768±0.054 | km./sec.„ | 27 | |
Buchara | Islands, I „ | October 21, 1907 | 3.837±0.065 | km./sec.„ | 19 | |
Buchara„ | Islands, I „ | October 27, 1907 | 3.760±0.069 | km./sec.„ | 11 |
Even if individual results do sometimes overlap, a considerable difference can on the average be recognized to the effect that the velocity of propagation through the oceans is about 0.1 km. per second greater than through the continents. This agrees with the expected theoretical values obtained from the physical properties of volcanic igneous rocks.
On the other hand, Tams also tried to combine the observations of as many earthquakes as possible, and thus obtained from the velocity values of 38 Pacific earthquakes an average value of 3.897 ± 0.028 km./sec., and from 45 Eurasian or American earthquakes 3.801 ± 0.029 km./sec., that is, practically the same values as above.
Angenheister[1] also has recently examined the seismical difference between ocean basins and continental
- ↑ G. Angenheister, “Beobachtungen an pazifischen Beben,” Nachr. d. Kg. Ges. d. Wiss. z. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Klasse, 1921, pp. 113–146. The work of Omori mentioned in the previous edition, who found such greater differences, rests on a misconception of that author with regard to the nature of the waves and is to be deleted.
Wege,” Centralbl. f. Min. Geol. u. Paläont., 1921, pp. 44–52 and 75–83, 1921.