Consider a slab of matter moving with velocity u_{x} along the x-axis, then even in a stationary field of electrostatic polarisation, that is, for a field in which δD/δt = 0, there will be some change in the polarisation of the body due to its motion, given by u_{x}(δD/δx). Hence we must add this term to a purely temporal rate of change δD/δt. Doing this we immediately arrive at equations (1·21) and (2·21) for the special case considered there.
Thus the Hertz-Heaviside form of field equations gives unity as the value for the Fresnelian convection co-efficient. It has been shown in the historical introduction how this is entirely at variance with the observed optical facts. As a matter of fact, Larmor has shown (Aether and Matter) that 1 - 1/μ^2 is not only sufficient but is also necessary, in order to explain experiments of the Arago prism type.
A short summary of the electromagnetic experiments bearing on this question, has already been given in the introduction.
According to Hertz and Heaviside the total polarisation is situated in the medium itself and is completely carried away by it. Thus the electromagnetic effect outside a moving medium should be proportional to K, the specific inductive capacity.
Rowland showed in 1876 that when a charged condenser is rapidly rotated (the dielectric remaining stationary), the magnetic effect outside is proportional to K, the Sp. Ind. Cap.
Röntgen (Annalen der Physik 1888, 1890) found that if the dielectric is rotated while the condenser remains stationary, the effect is proportional to K - 1.
