Page:The religion of Plutarch, a pagan creed of apostolic times; an essay (IA religionofplutar00oakeiala).pdf/95

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

Theology: we must borrow Reason from Philosophy, and take her as our guide to the mysteries of Religion, reverently submitting every detail of creed or practice to her authority.[1] We shall then avoid the charge that we take with our left hand what our teachers—our legislative, mythological, philosophic instructors—have offered with their right. The selecting and controlling power of Reason, applied to philosophical discussions, will enable us to attain to a becoming conception of the nature of the Deity; applied to the matter of Mythology, it will enable us to reject the narratives, at once discreditable and impossible, which have become current respecting the traditional gods; and, in the sphere of Law and Custom, it will enable us correctly to interpret the legal ordinances and established rules connected with sacrifices and other religious celebrations. The assumption which inspires all Plutarch's arguments on matters of Religion is that these three sources supply a rational basis for belief and conduct: but that superstition on the one hand, and atheistic misrepresentation on the other, have done so much to obscure the true principles of belief that Philosophy must analyse the whole material over again, and dissociate the rational and the pure from crude exaggerations and unintelligent accretions.[2] It mustDe Iside et Osiride, 378 A, B. "Un lien pieux se formait entre le myste et son mystagogue, lien qui ne pouvait plus se rompre sans crime."—Maury, vol. ii. cap. xi. For the saying of Theodorus about "taking with the left hand what is offered with the right," see De Tranquillitate Animi, 467 B.]

  1. [Greek: Logon ek philosophias mystagôgon analabontes.
  2. De Iside et Osiride, and De Superstitione, passim.