1792.
While, however, the court held the motion under advisement, it was voluntarily withdrawn, and the suit discontinued.[1]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg/40px-Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b1/Rule_Segment_-_Lozenge_5px_-_40px.svg/40px-Rule_Segment_-_Lozenge_5px_-_40px.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg/40px-Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg.png)
August Term, 1792.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg/40px-Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b1/Rule_Segment_-_Lozenge_5px_-_40px.svg/40px-Rule_Segment_-_Lozenge_5px_-_40px.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg/40px-Rule_Segment_-_Span_-_40px.svg.png)
The court being met, a commission, appointing Thomas Johnson one of the Justices, bearing date the 7th of November, 1791, was read; and he was qualified according to law.
Oswald, Administrator, versus the State of New-York:
Summons.Ingersoll moved for a rule on the marshall of the district of New-York, to return the writ in this cause; and, after advisement, the Court granted the rule in the following terms:
Ordered, That the marshall of the New-York district return the writ to him directed in this cause, before the adjournment of this court, if a copy of this rule shall be seasonably served upon him, or his deputy, or, otherwise, on the first day of the next term. And that in case of a default, he do show cause therefor, by affidavit taken before one of the judges of the United States.
The State of Georgia versus Braislford, et al.
guilty
- ↑ But see the same suit post, and Grayson versus Virginia.