106 OCTOB]?. TEHM, 1907. Opildon of file Oom?. ?U. 8. du? ? ?quor, ? ? ? ? ?, ? ? ? o? ?on of whi,?ey at a ? ? of ?d ?a?on, on the ? ?y of A?,'I?, ?ch ? ?k ? ? u?n ? ?o?t, ? ? ? of ?e w?ch w? ?e ?r ?e ?o? of ?d ?t of A? ?, ?, ? f? ?fie ? ? ? ?d by ? ?v?m_?, ? ? tw?ty-five yea?' ? ? ? not .e?, ?.?d w?y ?g ? ? ?n u?n ? ?o?ent for ? ?- ? ?me of it ? ? f?en? ?d ? ? ??" Mr. T? L. S? for ?owe?. T? 8o? G?d for ?e U&? S?. meut, de?ve? t? op?on of ? ?. ?' Ch?o, B?li? & ?i? ? Co. v. W?, 2? U.S. ?, ?, we ? ?on ? ?der ?e ? ?d me?nlnE of the ?xth ?fion of .the 3u&ci? Act of ?h 3, 1891, zutho?z?g ? ?t ? of Ap?s, ? ev? ? ?t?n i? ? '?c?on, ? ?y qu?fio? or pro?fio? of l?w tonging w?ch it d? ?c?on for t? ?r deo?on of the ?. ? ? t? ? ?he ?e, ?- no?d ? p?o? ?, ?t t? ?tho?ty ? ?ify ?uch qu?tio? co?d not ? ? for the ? of ?n? ? ? co? the wh&e ?, ?th ? i? ??, for ?d? tion ?d d?on. J? v. McK?, I?'U.'B. ?; W? ? v. Van ?l?, 116 U.S. ?; Un? ? v. R?, 1? ?. U?n ? ?ew of ? ?jud? ? we ? ? ?- "?e p?nt ?fi? b? ? ? ? q?tion of ? ?w ?d f?t ?d, zu?y, ? ?e ?? ?
�
