Page:United States Reports, Volume 209.djvu/365

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

209 U. 8. Op'mion of the Court. It is the contention of the Government that the paragraph ?eparates still wines in bottles into three elates and frees a specific rate of duty on each, as follows: "(a) Bottles 'containing each not more than one pint,' which are to be assessed as fu]? pints at $1.60 pe? 24 bottles, or atthe rate of 6] cents per pint; (b) bSttles 'containing each not. more tl?an one quart and' more than one pint,' which are to be asse?ed as full quarts at $1.60 per dozen bottles, that is, at the ?ame rote'of'6] cents per pint; and (c) bottles containing 'any excess beyond these quantities,' which are to be assessed at the rate of $1.60 per dozen, pins 5 cents per pint or frac- tional pint on the excess over a quart contained in'each bottle." . We think the contention is right, and need? no comment to make it 'clear. - Counsel for the Government 'also points out that the pro- visions of the tariff act of 1875 and subsequent act? were substantially similar .to' par.-.?raph 296, and that the Treasury decisions thereunder were-in. accordance wi?h the interpreta- tion for which the Government now contends. The first of the? decisions wns made in 1879: -_In re De L?ze, T. D. 4060. The ruling was repeated in 1893. ' In re G. W. Sheldon & Co., T. D. 14,461. And_ again in 1899. In re WFrnan, T. D. 20843. We have said that when the m?aning of a statute is. doubt- ful great weight should be given to the construction placed upon it by the department charged with its execution. Robert-. U.S. 136. And we have decided that the rc?nactment by Congress, without change, of a statute, which had previously received long continued executive construction, is an adoption U.S. 143, 152. Judgment reversed. MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM concur �solely because of the prior administrative construction.