Page:United States Reports 502 OCT. TERM 1991.pdf/321

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

502us1$13Z 08-21-96 15:26:37 PAGES OPINPGT

Cite as: 502 U. S. 151 (1991)

163

Scalia, J., concurring

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Justice Scalia, concurring. I join the opinion of the Court, including Parts II and III, which respond persuasively to legislative-history and policy arguments made by respondent. It is regrettable that we have a legal culture in which such arguments have to be addressed (and are indeed credited by a Court of Appeals), with respect to a statute utterly devoid of language that could remotely be thought to distinguish between long-term and short-term debt. Since there was here no contention of a “scrivener’s error” producing an absurd result, the plain text of the statute should have made this litigation unnecessary and unmaintainable.