Page:United States Reports 502 OCT. TERM 1991.pdf/961

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

502ord$pt2 08-08-95 19:35:59 PGT•ORDBV (Bound Volume)

1054

OCTOBER TERM, 1991 January 21, 1992

502 U. S.

No. D–1047. In re Disbarment of Katz. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 955.] No. D–1048. In re Disbarment of Cannavino. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 955.] No. D–1049. In re Disbarment of Beltre. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 965.] No. D–1050. In re Disbarment of Friedman. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 965.] No. D–1052. In re Disbarment of Cavacos. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 966.] No. D–1053. In re Disbarment of Michalek. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 966.] No. D–1063. In re Disbarment of Weiss. Motion to defer further consideration granted. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 1011.] No. D–1071. In re Disbarment of Wiley. It is ordered that Buford B. Wiley, Jr., of San Diego, Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. No. D–1072. In re Disbarment of Trudgeon. It is ordered that Jeffrey C. Trudgeon, of Upland, Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. No. D–1073. In re Disbarment of Zadan. It is ordered that Michael E. Zadan, of San Diego, Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. No. D–1074. In re Disbarment of Clements. It is ordered that James F. Clements, of Landover, Md., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.