Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 106 Part 3.djvu/142

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

106 STAT. 1936 PUBLIC LAW 102-396—OCT. 6, 1992 Israel. President. Federal budget. 10 USC 221 note. Reports. (c) For purposes only of this section, Israel shall be considered in the European Theater in every respect, with its firms fully eU^ble for nonrestrictive, nondiscriminatory contract competition under the Overseas Workload Program. (d) No funds appropriated for the Overseas Workload Program for fiscal year 1993 or thereafter shall be used for contracts awarded in fiscal year 1993 or thereafter which have not been opened for competition in a manner consistent with this provision. SEC. 9131. (a) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in this Act may be used to transport or provide for the transportation of chemical munitions to the Johnston Atoll for the purpose of storing or demilitarizing such munitions. (b) The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any obsolete World War II chemical mimition of the United States found in the World War II Pacific Theater of Operations. (c) The President may suspend the application of subsection (a) during a period of war in which the United States is a party. SEC. 9132. The President shall include with each budget for a fiscal year submitted to the Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, materials that shall identify clearly and separately the amounts requested in the budget for appropriation for that fiscal year for salaries and expenses related to administrative activities of the Department of Defense, the military departments, and the Defense Agencies. SEC. 9133. None of the funds provided in this Act may be obligated to implement any test of changes in the Department's domestic interstate household goods program as proposed in the Federal Register on June 29, 1992. SEC. 9134. The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the conduct of an independent study, with participation by one or more federally funded research and development centers, of the Trident missile system. A report containing the results of such study, together with the Secretary's comments and recommendations concerning the report shall be submitted to the Congressional defense committees, in classified and unclassified versions, on or before July 1, 1993. This report shall address, inter alia, the following issues: (1) The relative merits and costs of continuing the Trident II missile production versus the refurbishment of existing Trident I missiles, taking into account such factors as inflation, appropriate regulations such as OMB Circular A-94 and DOD Instruction 7041.3, refurbishment costs for the Trident I that would be incurred anyway, the impact of the new START agreements, refurbishment requirements of the Trident II, and other related factors. (2) The relative merits and costs of continuing with current plans to backfit the first eight Trident submarines with Trident II missiles versus their continuation with Trident I missiles, taking into account such factors as inflation, appropriate regulations such as OMB Circular A-94 and DOD Instruction 7041.3, refurbishment costs for the Trident I that would be incurred anyway, the impact of the new START agreements, refurbishment requirements of the Trident II, and other related factors. (3) The relative merits and costs of taking anticipated SLBM warhead reductions under START in the following ways: (A) by offloading individual warheads from missiles; (B) by offloading missiles from submarines;