PUBLIC LAW 102-484—OCT. 23, 1992 106 STAT. 2635 Project 92-D -200, laboratories facilities upgrades, various locations, $7,500,000. Project 90-N -102, expended core facility dry cell project, Naval Reactors FacUity, Idaho, $13,600,000. Project 90-N -103, advanced test reactor off-gas treatment system, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho, $500,000. Project 90-N-104, facilities renovation. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Niskayuna, New York, $2,900,000. (c) CAPITAL EQUIPMENT. —Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 1993 for capital equipment not related to construction in carrying out nuclear materisus production and other defense programs necessary for national security programs as follows: (1) For nuclear materials production, $80,900,000. (2) For verification and control technology, $16,500,000. (3) For nuclear safeguards and security, $5,327,000. (4) For nuclear safety, $50,000. (5) For naval reactors development, $60,400,000. (d) ADJUSTMENTS. —^ ^rhe total amount that may be appropriated 1 pursuant to this section is the sum of the amounts specuied in ' subsections (a) through (c)— (1) reduced by— (A) $400,000,000 for recovery of overpayment to the Savannah River Pension Fund; (B) $45,000,000 for anticipated savings; and (C) $31,082,000 for use of prior-year balances; and (2) increased by $22,400,000 for education programs. SEC. 3106. FUNDING USES AND LIMITATIONS. (a) INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION. —Of the funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 1993 for operating expenses and capital equipment, $212,300,000 shall be available for the defense inertial confinement fiision program. (b) FIRE PROTECTION AND COOLING OR REFRIGERATION SYS- TEMS.— None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 1993 may be obligated for the design, purchase, or installation of any fire protection system or cooling or refrigeration system that utilizes class I chlorofluorocarbons (as hsted under section 602(a) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7671a(a))) unless the Secretary of Energy determines that an alternative system meeting the operational requirements of the Department of Energy is not commercially available or is not cost-effective when analyzed under a life-cycle cost analysis. (c) RECONFIGURATION OF NONNUCLEAR ACTIVITIES.—(1) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Energy may be obligated for the implementation oi the reconfiguration of any nonnuclear activities of the Department of Energy until— (A) the Secretary of Energy submits a report to the congressional defense committees mat contains an analysis of the projected life-cycle costs and benefits of the proposed nonnuclear reconfiguration and an analysis— (i) of the alternatives to the current configiuration of nonnuclear activities of the Department of Energy identified in any environmental documentation prepared pursu-
�
