PUBLIC LAW 102-580—(Xrr. 31, 1992 106 STAT. 4801 (15) the improvement of the Nation's inland waterway system is a centred part of a national intermodal transportation system which permits the efficient transport of goods between markets within the Nation and between inland markets and coastal ports; (16) the prevention of massive flood damages to the Nation's cities, industries, cultural facilities, mimicipal facilities, and transportation system plays a vital role in the protection of the Nation's infrastructure and the efficient conduct of commerce; (17) the provision of municipal and industrial water supply plays a crucial role in the well-being and functioning of the Nation's communities and industries and in the health, environment, and quality of life of the Nation; (18) the generation of hydroelectric power contributes significantly to the Nation's supply of low-cost energy and plays a significant role in reducing air pollution; (19) the provision of recreational opportunities and the protection ana enhancement of fish and wildlife habitat and environmental values contribute to the well-being of the people of the Nation; and (20) improvement and protection of the Nation's infrastructure is an essential, proper, and necessary role of government at all levels. SEC. 3. SECRETARY DEFINED. 33 USC 2201 For purposes of this Act, the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Army. TITLE I—WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS. Except as provided in this section, the following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in the respective reports designated in this section: (1) SOUTHEAST ALASKA HARBORS OF REFUGE, ALASKA.—The project for navigation. Southeast Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $15,013,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,763,000. (2) WHITEMAN'S CREEK, ARKANSAS. — The project for flood control, Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost of $4,978,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,838,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000. (3) MORRO BAY HARBOR, CAUFORNIA. —The project for navigation, Morro Bay Harbor, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 4, 1992, at a total cost of $2,056,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $1,644,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $412,000. (4) SACRAMENTO METRO AREA, CAUFORNIA. —The project for flood control, Sacramento Metro Area, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 29, 1992, at a total cost
�
