113 STAT. 336 PUBLIC LAW 106-53—AUG. 17, 1999 "(15) NORTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.— $500,000 for water related infrastructure in North Fayette Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. "(16) SPRINGDALE BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.—$500,000 for water related infrastructure in Springdale Borough, Pennsylvania. "(17) ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA.— $1,200,000 for water related infrastructure in Robinson Township, Pennsylvania. "(18) UPPER ALLEN TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA.— $3,400,000 for water related infrastructiu"e in Upper Allen Township, Pennsylvemia. "(19) JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP, GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYL- VANIA.— $1,000,000 for water related infrastructure in Jefferson Township, Greene County, Pennsylvania. "(20) LUMBERTON, NORTH CAROLINA.— $1,700,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure projects in Lumberton, North Carolina. "(21) BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.—$10,000,000 for water related infrastructure for the parishes of East Baton Rouge, Ascension, and Livingston, Louisiana. "(22) EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—$25,000,000 for ground water recharge and conjunctive use projects in Stockton East Water District, California. "(23) SACRAMENTO AREA, CALIFORNIA.—$25,000,000 for regionad water conservation and recycling projects in Placer and El Dorado Counties and the San Juan Suburban Water District, California. "(24) CUMBERLAND COUNTY, TENNESSEE. —$5,000,000 for water supply projects in Cumberland County, Tennessee. "(25) LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA. — $5,000,000 for water supply treatment and distribution projects in the counties of Calhoun, Clarendon, Colleton, Dorchester, Orangeberg, and Sumter, South Carolina. " (26) BRIDGEPORT, CONNECTICUT. — $10,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Bridgeport, Connecticut. "(27) HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT.— $10,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Hartford, Connecticut. "(28) NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT.— $10,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of New Haven, Connecticut. "(29) OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN.—$20,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the cities of Berkley, Ferndale, Madison Heights, Royal Oak, Birmingham, Hazel Park, Oak Park, Southfield, Clawson, Huntington Woods, Pleasant Ridge, and Troy, and the village of Beverly Hills, and the Charter Township of Royal Oak, Michigan. "(30) DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.—$10,000,000 for a wastewater treatment project in the county of DeSoto, Mississippi. "(31) KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.— $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Kansas City, Missouri.
�
