Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 114 Part 4.djvu/543

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.


PUBLIC LAW 106-541—DEC. 11, 2000 114 STAT. 2605 SEC. 320. BRECKENRIDGE, MINNESOTA. (a) IN GENERAL. —The Secretary may complete the project for flood damage reduction, Breckenridge, Minnesota, substantially in accordance with the detailed project report dated September 2000, at a total cost of $21,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,650,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,350,000. (b) IN-KIND SERVICES. —The non-Federal interest may provide its share of project costs in cash or in the form of in-kind services or materials. (c) CREDIT. —The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and construction work carried out on the project by the non-Federal interest before the date of the cooperation agreement for the modified project or execution of a new cooperation agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. SEC. 321. DULUTH HARBOR, MINNESOTA. The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, Minnesota, carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include the relocation of Scenic Highway 61, including any required bridge construction. SEC. 322. LITTLE FALLS, MINNESOTA. The project for clearing, snagging, and sediment removal, East Bank of the Mississippi River, Little Falls, Minnesota, authorized under section 3 of the Act entitled "An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes", approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), is modified to direct the Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the plans contained in the feasibility report of the District Engineer, dated June 2000. SEC. 323. NEW MADRID COUNTY, MISSOURI. (a) IN GENERAL. —The project for navigation. New Madrid County Harbor, New Madrid County, Missouri, carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is authorized as described in the feasibility report for the project, including both phase 1 and phase 2 of the project. (b) CREDIT. —The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the costs of construction work for phase 1 of the project carried out by the non-Federal interest if the Secretary determines that the construction work is integral to the project. SEC. 324. PEMISCOT COIFNTY HARBOR, MISSOURI. The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for navigation, Pemiscot County Harbor, Missouri, carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), the cost of construction work carried out for the project after December 31, 1997, by the non-Federal interest if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project. SEC. 325. FORT PECK FISH HATCHERY, MONTANA. (a) FINDINGS. —Congress finds that— (1) Fort Peck Lake, Montana, is in need of a multispecies fish hatchery;