PUBLIC LAW 108–136—NOV. 24, 2003
117 STAT. 1539
the benefits of each of the possible alternative contracting approaches identified under subparagraph (B) of that paragraph. However, savings in administrative or personnel costs alone do not constitute, for such purposes, a sufficient justification for a consolidation of contract requirements in a procurement unless the total amount of the cost savings is expected to be substantial in relation to the total cost of the procurement. ‘‘(3) Benefits considered for the purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2) may include cost and, regardless of whether quantifiable in dollar amounts— ‘‘(A) quality; ‘‘(B) acquisition cycle; ‘‘(C) terms and conditions; and ‘‘(D) any other benefit. ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: ‘‘(1) The terms ‘consolidation of contract requirements’ and ‘consolidation’, with respect to contract requirements of a military department, Defense Agency, or Department of Defense Field Activity, mean a use of a solicitation to obtain offers for a single contract or a multiple award contract to satisfy two or more requirements of that department, agency, or activity for goods or services that have previously been provided to, or performed for, that department, agency, or activity under two or more separate contracts smaller in cost than the total cost of the contract for which the offers are solicited. ‘‘(2) The term ‘multiple award contract’ means— ‘‘(A) a contract that is entered into by the Administrator of General Services under the multiple award schedule program referred to in section 2302(2)(C) of this title; ‘‘(B) a multiple award task order contract or delivery order contract that is entered into under the authority of sections 2304a through 2304d of this title or sections 303H through 303K of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253h through 253k); and ‘‘(C) any other indeterminate delivery, indeterminate quantity contract that is entered into by the head of a Federal agency with two or more sources pursuant to the same solicitation. ‘‘(3) The term ‘senior procurement executive concerned’ means— ‘‘(A) with respect to a military department, the official designated under section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3)) as the senior procurement executive for the military department; or ‘‘(B) with respect to a Defense Agency or a Department of Defense Field Activity, the official so designated for the Department of Defense. ‘‘(4) The term ‘small business concern’ means a business concern that is determined by the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to be a small-business concern by application of the standards prescribed under section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)).’’.
VerDate 11-MAY-2000
10:15 Aug 27, 2004
Jkt 019194
PO 00000
Frm 00491
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
D:\STATUTES\2003\19194PT2.001
APPS10
PsN: 19194PT2
�
