Trrrrz xm.—THE J l'DICIARY.—Ch. 3. 95 Second. Of all eases arising under any act for the punishment of piracy. Ofpifwiwhenwhen no circuit court is held in the district of such court. 3 Marlr ;,gg3_ Q_ 72, v. 3, p. 789. 15 May, 1820, c. 113, v. 3, p. 600. 30 Jan., 1823, c. 7, v. 3, p. 721. The Palmyra, 12 Wh., 1. Third. Of all suits for penalties and forfeitures incurred under any law Penalties und of the United States. f°"f“f“'f€·_ 24 Sept., 1789, c. 20, s. 9, v. 1, p. 76. Ketland v. The Cassius, 2 Dall., 365; Hall z-. Warren, 2 11 cLean, 332. Fourth. Of all suits at common law brought by the United States, or Suitsat qommon bv any officer thereof. authorized by law to sue. l"' by l nl md
- States or officers.
24 Slept., 1789, c. 20, s. 9, v. 1, p. 76. 3 Mar., 1815, c. 101, s. 4, v. 3, p. 245. Parsons-; Bedfo ,3 Pet., 433; Duncan I,. S., 7 Pet.,435. Fifth. Of all suits in equity to enforce the lien of the United States Suitsingequityto upon any real estate for any internal-revenue tax, or to subject to the °“f°’°° t;“*°"““l‘ payment of any such tax any real estate owned by the delinquent, or in rfi°T5’_ x°°‘__ which he has any right, title, or interest. {SMS8W?-] 86 20 July, 1868, ,,_ 1 ,s. 106, v. 15, p. 167. Sixth. Of all suits for the recovery of any forfeiture or damages under _ Suits for penalseetion thirty-four hundred and_ninety, Title °‘ Dams DUE nr on TO Tm; 1**** ,’“‘l, d“'“’?8?' UNITED S·rA·rr:s;" and such suits may be tried and determined by any Q$:,,,§°S,;,°;§l"" district court within whose jurisdictional limits the defendant may be jygyygjggjgj found. ls··nu••>4•••.1 _ _ S.4, v. 12, p.698. ’ TSeventh. Of all causes of action arising under the postal laws of the 5,,;;,,, ,,,,,;,;,,.,,,,8,- L mted States. yawn. s Mu., ms, C. 43, S. 20, v. sj E 1z0. Eighth. Of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; Adrrnirgnlty causes saving to suitors in all cases the right of a common-law remedy, where 2;:, ”‘”“’“ °” the common law is competent to give it; and of all seizures on land and _;____.__ on waters not within admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. And such ·?4S¢p¢·.1789.c. jurisdiction shall be exclusive, except in_ the particular cases where j urls- 20;;-;;:; 1·,¥.;é,_;6;_ diction of such causes and seizures is given to the circuit courts. [And uf, ,_ ,,_`]_ p_ 3;,7; shall have original and exclusive cognizance of all lprizes brought into 10 May, 1800, c. the United States, except as provided in paragrap six of section six 51. ·1.5,v.2,1>1>- hundred and twenty-nine.] 70k?;,;" ,807 C 22, ss. 2, 7, v. 2, pp. 426, 428. 6 Aug., 1861, c. 60, s. 2, v. 12, p. 319. 13 July, 1866,c. 184; ss. 9, 19, v. 14, pp. 111, 145, 152. 2 Mar., 1867, c. 169,ss. 10,25, v. 14, pp. 475, 483. 20 July, 1868, c. 186, s. 106,v. 15, p. 167. 30 June, 1864, c. 173, ss.41, 179, v. 13, pp. 239, 240, 305. 3 Mar., 1865, c. 78, s. 1,v. 13, p. 483. 18 Feb., 1875, c. 80, v. 18, p. 3l7.—Glass v. Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall., 6; Bingham 1-. Cabbo, 3 Dall., 19; U. S. v. Schooner Sallie, 2 Cr., 406; Rose v. Himely, 4 Cr., 241; lf. S. 1-. Betsey and Charlotte, 4 Cr., 443; Keene 1-. U. S., 5 Cr., 304; The Samuel, 1 Wh., 9; Ulnvincible, 1 Wh., 238; U. S. 1-. Coolidge, 1 Wh., 415; Slocum zi. Mayberrv, 2 Wh., 1; The Estrella, 4 Wh., 298; L’Amistad de Ruez,5 Wh., 385; The Sarah,8 Wh.,391; The Margaret,9 Wh., 119; The Merino, 9 Wh., 391; Ramsay v. Allegre, 12 Wh., 611; Hobart v. Drogan, 10 Pet., 108; The Orleans 1-. Phmbus, 11 Pet., 175; Smith r. Condry, 1 How., 28; \’\ aring rv. Clarke, 5 How., 441; New Jersey Steam Navimon Company 2-. Merchants Bank, 6 How., 344; The Genesee Chief, 12 How., 443; tz 1-. Bul , 12 How., 466; Walsh r. Rogers, 13 How., 283; Steamboat New World 1-. King, 16 How., 469; Bogard v. Steamboat John Jay, 17 How., 399; Ward r. Peck, 18 How., 267; Ure v. Coffman, 19 How., 56; Jackson v. Steamboat Magnolia, 20 How., 296; People’s Ferry Company v. Beers, 20 How., 393; Taylor v. Carr -1, 20 How.,598; Allen 1-. Newberry, 21 How., 244; Nelson v. Leland, 22 How., 48; Roach 1-. Chapman, 22 How., 129; Ward v. Thompson, 22 How., 330; Railroad v. Steam Tow-boat Compan , 23 How., 209; Moorewood z-. Enequist, 23 How., 491; The Steamer St. Lawrence, 1 Bll,522; The Propeller Commerce, 1 B1., 574; The Plvmouth, 3 Wall., 20; The Moses Taylor, 4 Wall., 411; Hine v.Trevor,4 Wall.,555; The Eddy, 5 Wall.,481; The Siren, 7 Wall., 152; The Belfast, 7 Wall.,624; The Eagle,8 Wall., 15; The Maggie Hammond,9 Wall. 435; Norwich Corripanyr. Wright, 13 Wall., 104; Steamboat Compandy v. Chase, 16 Wall.,622; Atkins 1-. he isintegrating Company, 18 Wall., 272; Cor el 1-. Coryell, 4 Wash. C. C., 371; Clark r. U. S., 2 Wash. C. C., 519; he Abbv, 1 Mas., 360; The Washington, 4 Blatch., 101; Jennings r. t"arson’s exs., 1 Pet. Ad., 1; The Jerusalem, 2 Gallis.,345; De Lovio v. Boil, 2 Gallis., 398; Uastrell r. Raymond,2 Wood, 213. Ninth. Of all proceedings for the condemnation of property taken as Condemnutiouof prize, in pursuance- of section fifty-three hundred and [seventy-sim,] [eight.] Il;;]f;l;'”'*Y *“k‘*“ ‘*“ Pitle °"lNSURI{EC'.l`ION.” - -‘-‘ s .- . —— 6 Aug., 1861, c.aao, s. 2, v. 12, p. 319. 18 Feb., 1875, 7-. 80, »·. 18, p. 317.
