SIX’I`Y·FOURTH CONGRESS. Sess. I. Ch. 209. 1916. 305 Milk River project, Montana: For maintenance, operation, con- “’“““'°'·“°°*· tinuation of construction, and incidental operations, $696,000; Sun River project, Montana: For maintenance, operation, contin- Sm R*'°*· ¥°¤°- uation of construction, and incidental operations, $205,000; Lower Yellowstone project, Montana—Nortl1 Dakota: For mainte- 1,};*,**;**,; §:Q°"”°¤°· » nance, operation, continuation of construction, and incidental opera- ` ` tions, $30,000; _ North Platte project, Nebraska-Wyoming: For maintenance, oper- w§,*;“* *"·**•· N•‘*·· ation, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $1,100 000, together with the un ended balance of the sum a propriated for this project for theezcal year nineteen hundredp and sixteen' Truckee-Carson project, Nevada: For maintenance, operation, con- Nfv'“°*°°·°°”°”· tinuation of construction, and incidental operations, $220,000, to- - gether with the unexpended balance of the sum appropriated for this prcgect for the fiscal ear nineteen hundred and sixteen; · arlsbad project, New Mexico: For maintenance, operation, con- °°""’“"·N·“°‘· tinuation of construction, and incidental operations, $323,000 together .. · . . with the unexpended balance of the sum appropriatedfor this project for the fiscal year nineteen hundred and srxteen; " ' Hondo project, New Mexico: For maintenance, operation, and H°"°°·N·““· incidental o tions, $4 000· — ‘ Rio Grange project, New Mexico4Texas‘: For maintenance, opera- T{'§°°"“"°·“·""*· tion, continuation of construction, and incidental operations, $595 000, _ _., together with the balance of the sum appropriateclfor _ — this project for the iisca year nineteen hundred and sixteen; _ ‘ _ ‘ . North Dakota pumping {project, North Dakota: For maintenance, ,,,§°'“*D•**•°*v¤¤P· operation, continuation o construction, and incidental operations, $50,000; Lawton project, Oklahoma: For maintenance, operation, continu- L‘""°"·°“°~ ation of construction, and incidental operations, $51,000; Umatilla project, Or on: For maintenance, operation, continua- _U"“°m°·°’°¤~ tion of construction, anedgincidental operations, $235,000; Klamath project, Oregon-California: For maintenance, operation, m"'“"*· °"’*‘°‘*· continuation o construction, and incidental operations, $180,000; together with the unexpended balance of the sum appropriated for this pro`ect for the iisca ggear nineteen hundred and sixteen; B n F h Be le liourche project, uth Dakota: For maintenance, operation, nu; ° °`"° °’ s' continuation of construction and incidental operations, $98,000, together with the unex ended balance of the sum appropriated for this pro'ect for the Hscajl year nineteen hundred and sixteen; 8 Strawlberry Valley project, Utah: For maintenance, operation, o¤:K"°°"’ WI"' continuation of construction and incidental operations, $315,000; 0 Okanogan project, Washington: For maintenance, operation, mm"' wm" continuation o construction, and incidental operations, $58,000; Y W h Yakima project, Washington: For maintenance, operation, con- mm°’ °“ ' tinuation of construction, and incidental operations, $798,000, together with the unex ended balance of the sum appropriated for this project for the fiscal) year nineteen hundred and sixteen; Shoshone project, Wyoming: For maintenance, operation, contin- S°°°‘°“· W’°‘ uation of construction, and incidental operations, $762,000 together with the rmexpended balance of the sum appropriated for this project for the fiscal year nineteen hundred and sixteen; For cooperative and other miscellaneous investigations (secondary S°°°"°""‘°l°°°" prpjects), $50,000; nder the rovisions of this Act no greater sum shall be eztrhpended nor shall theillnited States be obligated to expend, during e fiscal •*¤- year nineteen hundred and seventeen, on any reclamation project appropriated for herein an amount in excess of the sum herein approprinted therefor, nor shall the whole expenditures or obligations 91890°-·vox. 39—r>·r 1--20
