Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 49 Part 1.djvu/232

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

74TH CONGRESS . SESS. 1. CH. 101. MAY 9, 1935 . 187 For op eration an d maintena nce of the San Carlo s project for the ri za car ' project, irrigation of lands in the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona, Maintenance, etc. $105,000, reimbursable, together with $119,000 from which amount expenditu res shall not exceed the aggre gate recei pts covere d into the Treas ury in acc ordance wi th section 4 of the Permanent Appro- vol- 48, p. 1227. pria.tion Repeal Act, 1934 . For improvement, operation, and maintenance of the pum ping Colorado River Res- plants and irrigation system on the Colorado River Indian Reserva- I errrigi•aa, tig z ' tribal tion, Arizona., as provided in the Act of April 4, 1910 (36 Stat ., la `s. 38,p.273. p . 273), $14,000, reimbursable, together with $24,000 from which amount expenditures shall not exceed the aggregate receipts covered into the Treasury in accordance with section 4 of the Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act, 1934 . Operation and maintenance, pumping plants, San Carlos Reserva- ti sad arlos Reserva- on, A c riz . tion, Arizona (tribal funds)

For the operation and maintenance Irrigating tribal of pumping plants for the irrigation of lands on the San Carlos lands . Reservation, in Arizona, $4,500, to be paid from the funds held by the United States in trust for the Indians of such reservation Provided, That the sum so used shall be reimbursed to the tribe by Proviso . eat . the Indians benefited, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe . For reclamation and maintenance charges on Indian lands within vuma Reservation, Calif.-Ariz . th e Yuma Res ervation, California , and on t en acres w ithin each of Reclamation, etc., the eleven Yu ma homestead entries in Arizona under the Yu ma c harges . recla mation pro ject, $11, 800, reimb ursable, t ogether wi th $13,00 0 Reimbur sement. from which amount expenditures shall not exceed the aggregate receipts covered into the Treasury in accordance wi th Section 4 of the Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act, 1934. For improvements, maintenance, and operation of the Fort Hall Fort "an project, irrigation system, Idaho, $25,000, together with $22,000 from which IdMaointenance, etc . amount expenditures shall not exceed the aggregate receipts covered into the Treasury in accordance with section 4 of the Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act, 1934. For maintenance and operation, repairs, and purchase of stored Fort Belknap Reser- waters, irrigation systems, Fort Belknap Reservation, Montana,

rn, Mont . "' I ' rrigating tribal $14,800 , reimburs able, toge ther with $4,2 00 from which amount lands . expenditu res shall not exceed the aggre gate recei pts covere d into the Treasury in accordance with section 4 of the Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act, 1934 . For maint enance an d operatio n of the L ittle Porc upine Divi sion, Fo rt Pec k project, th e Big Porc upine Divi sion, and not exceed ing four t housand ac res Maintenance, e tc, un der the We st Side Ca nal of the Poplar Ri ver Divisi on, Fort P eck project., Montana, $7,000, reimbursable, together with $3,000 from Reimbursable. wh ich amount expenditu res shall not exceed the aggre gate recei pts covered into the Treasury in accordance with Section 4 of the Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act, 1934 . For operation and maintenance of the irrigation systems on the Flathead Reserva- tion, Mont . Flat head In dian Res ervatio n, Mont ana, $12 ,000, r eimbursa ble, Irrigating tribal together with $110,000 from which amount expenditures shall not lands . exceed the aggregate receipts covered into the Treasury in accordance with section 4 of the Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act, 1934 : Provided, That (with the consent of the irrigation districts of the Provisos. Mod ify ing te rms of Flathead irrigation project which have executed repayment contracts contracts . with the United States as required by law) the Secretary of the Interior may modify the terms of such contracts by requiring the operation and maintenance charges (not heretofore carried into con- struction costs and which were dealt with in the Act of March 7, vol . 45, pp. 212 213. 1928 (45 Stat ., pp . 212-213) ), and those accruing subsequent to March 7, 1928, which were due and u npaid at t he time of executio n