Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 88 Part 2.djvu/392

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

[88 STAT. 1708]
PUBLIC LAW 93-000—MMMM. DD, 1975
[88 STAT. 1708]

1708

wrIuen^or°orai communications,

PUBLIC LAW 93-528-DEC. 21, 1974

[88 STAT.

"(5) take such other action in the public interest as the court may deem appropriate. "^s) ^ o t later thau 10 dajs following the date of the filing of ^^J proposal for a conseut judgment under subsection (b), each defendant shall file with the district court a description of any and all written or oral communications by or on behalf of such defendant, including any and all written or oral communications on behalf of such defendant, or other person, with any officer or employee of the United States concerning or relevant to such proposal, except that any such communications made by counsel of record alone with the Attorney General or the employees of the Department of Justice alone shall be excluded from the requirements of this subsection. Prior to the entry of any consent judgment pursuant to the antitrust laws, each defendant shall certify to the district court that the requirements of this subsection have been complied with and that such filing is a true and complete description of such communications known to the defendant or which the defendant reasonably shoidd have known. " (h) Proceedings before the district court under subsections (e) and (f) of this section, and the competitive impact statement filed under subsection (b) of this section, shall not be admissible against any defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other party against such defendant under the antitrust laws or by the United States under section 4A of this Act nor constitute a basis for the introduction of the consent judgment as prima facie evidence against such defendant in any such action or proceeding." PENALTIES

SEC. 3. Sections 1, 2, and 3 of the Act entitled "An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies", approved July 2, 1890 (15 U.S.C. 1, 2, and 3), are each amended— (1) by striking out "misdemeanor" whenever it appears and inserting in lieu thereof in each case "felony"; (2) by striking out "fifty thousand dollars" whenever such phrase appears and inserting in lieu thereof in each case the following: "one million dollars if a corporation, or, if any other person, one hundred thousand dollars"; and (3) by striking out "one year" whenever such phrase appears and inserting in lieu thereof in each case "three years". EXPEDITING ACT REVISIONS

SEC. 4. Section 1 of the Act of February 11, 1903 (32 Stat. 823), as amended (15 U.S.C. 28; 49 U.S.C. 44), commonly known as the Expediting Act, is amended to read as follows: "SECTION 1. In any civil action brought in any district court of the United States under the Act entitled 'An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies', approved July 2, 1890, or any other Acts having like purpose that have been or hereafter may be enacted, wherein the United States is plaintiff and equitable relief is sought, the Attorney General may file with the court, prior to the entry of final judgment, a certificate that, in his opinion, the case is of a general public importance. Upon filing of such certificate, it shall be the duty of the judge designated to hear and