Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 94 Part 1.djvu/1376

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

PUBLIC LAW 96-000—MMMM. DD, 1980

94 STAT. 1326

l6 USC 777e.

PUBLIC LAW 96-366—SEPT. 29, 1980

(2) If reimbursement is sought under subsection (a)(2), such costs have been incurred in revising the plan in a manner consistent with such requirements. (3) If reimbursement is sought under subsection (a)(3), such costs have been incurred in implementing the conservation actions as approved by the Secretary. (4) If reimbursement is sought under subsection (a)(4), such costs have been incurred in implementing conservation actions specified in, and in a manner consistent with, the approved conservation plan. (5) If reimbursement is sought under subsection (a)(5), such costs have been incurred in consolidating, coordinating or implementing conservation plans and actions approved under this Act with approved pl£ms and actions under the Act of August 9, 1950 (16 U.S.C. 777c(a)(l)), commonly referred to as the DingellJohnson Sport Fish Restoration Act and the Act of September 2, 1937 (16 U.S.C. 669e(a)(l)), commonly referred to as the PittmanRobertson Wildlife Restoration Act in a manner consistent with sections 2 and 4 of this Act. (d) REIMBURSEMENT.—Subject to the limitations in subsection (c) and the terms and conditions imposed under section 7, and to the availability of funds appropriated under section 11, the Secretary shall reimburse each State which the Secretary finds to be eligible therefor under subsection (c). (e) LIMITATIONS.—(1) The total amount of the reimbursement paid to any State under this section with respect to any fiscal year may not exceed the allocation available to the State under section 8 for such year. (2) No reimbursement m£^ be paid under this section to any State for any cost incurred by the State during any fisced year— (A) after September 30, 1991, in developing a conservation plan; (B) after September 30, 1986, for costs incurred in implementing certain nongame fish and wildlife actions approved under section 5(d); (C) in which less than 80 percent of the costs to be reimbursed are for the principal benefit of nongame fish and wildlife or the users of nongame fish and wildlife; (D) in implementing an approved conservation plan, unless the cost was incurred in implementing actions approved under section 5(c) or (d); (E) in implementing an approved conservation plan covering only nongame fish and wildlife, or any nongame fish and wildlife conservation action approved under section 5(c) or (d), to the extent that more than 10 percent of such costs are paid for with moneys collected during such year by the State— (i) from the sale of hunting, fishing, and trapping licenses, and (ii) as penalties (including forfeitures) for violations of the hunting, fishing, and trapping laws of the State; or (F) in implementing an approved conservation plan or any nongame fish and wildlife conservation action approved under section 5(c) or (d), to the extent that— (i) more than 10 percent of such costs are applied for purposes of conservation law enforcement under any such plan or action, and