Page:VCH Norfolk 2.djvu/566

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

A HISTORY OF NORFOLK threatened an impeachment of the ministers should any great stroke be struck in Norfolk for want of those precautions which had been pointed out to the honourable gentlemen.'^ By 1804 there were 32,000 men of all ranks ready for the reception of any invading army, though, happily, they were never called upon. In 1806 the Wodehouse party was again severely beaten at the polls, ' Coke of Norfolk ' and William Windham being easily successful, though unseated on a petition. In the next year Sir J. H. Astley (ancestor of Lord Hastings) and Edward Coke, esq. of Derby were elected, probably by arrangement. Later in the year, however, ' Coke of Norfolk ' took his kinsman's place, a seat having been found for Edward Coke at Derby. There were of course great rejoicings at Norwich and in the county generally at the news of the victory of Waterloo, but the happiness of this year was greatly marred locally by the Corn Law riots. These were most serious at Downham, where the military had to be called out, and at the subsequent trials sixteen of the rioters were condemned to death, though two only were executed. In 1822 there were serious rick-burning riots and much open destruction of threshing-machines, but these troubles were suppressed without loss of life. There were also the weavers' riots in 1826, and renewed rick burnings in 183 1, which were probably not unconnected with the agitation which brought in reform. The Reform Bill in 1832 disfranchised Castle Rising and divided Norfolk into two divisions, each returning two members. In 1867-8 Thetford and Yarmouth were dis- franchised, and the county received two members more. This arrangement was again changed by the Redistribution Bill of 1885, which divided the county into six single-member constituencies, North-Western, South- Western, North, East, Mid, and South. Yarmouth, which had been disfranchised in 1867 for notorious corruption, now received one member from King's Lynn. The latest incident in the political history of Yarmouth is fresh in the memory of all. During the reign of the late Queen Victoria the only signs of any local trouble or political ferment were those seen at the time of the Chartist movement in 1839 and 1841. The movement seems, however, to have found but very little support in Norfolk, and the subsequent political history of the county has been that of the various contests between the two political parties of the day. The two regular battalions of the present territorial regiment are furnished by the old Ninth Foot, which in its early days had no connexion with Norfolk, having been raised in Gloucestershire during Monmouth's rebellion, though Sedgemoor was fought and won before the new corps was ready for the field.^ It then saw long and honourable service at the passage of the Boyne, in the Peninsula,' with Galway, at Belle-Isle, Havannah and elsewhere, though fated to share the bitterness of Burgoyne's surrender at Saratoga.* As early as the reign of Queen Anne, the Ninth bore the famous regimental badge of Britannia, but armed with a spear, which was officially confirmed to it in 1799.^ The Irish Army Lists after 1746 mention its ' Pellew, Lift of Lord SiJmouth, ii, 232. * Hist. Rec. of Ninth Reg. (1848), et seq. ' At Almanza the regiment was nearly annihilated.

  • Lawrence-Archer, British Army, 173. ' Hist. Rec. ut supra, 37.

524