these went such harsh regulations as largely neutralized the concessions and gave ground for the
assumption that once free from Northern control
the South would virtually re-enslave the Negro.
The colored people themselves naturally feared
this and protested, as in Mississippi, “against the
reactionary policy prevailing and expressing the
fear that the Legislature will pass such proscriptive laws as will drive the freedmen from the State
or practically re-enslave them.”[1]
As Professor Burgess (whom no one accuses of being Negrophile) says: “Almost every act, word or gesture of the Negro not consonant with good taste and good manners as well as good morals was made a crime or misdemeanor, for which he could first be fined by the magistrates and then be consigned to a condition of almost slavery for an indefinite time if he could not pay the bill.”
All things considered, it seems probable that if the South had been permitted to have its way in 1865 the harshness of Negro slavery would have been mitigated so as to make slave trading difficult and to make it possible for a Negro to hold property if he got any and to appear in some cases in court; but that in most other respects the blacks would have remained in slavery. And no small
- ↑ 16 October 7, 1865.
