Page:William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (3rd ed, 1768, vol II).djvu/350

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
334
The Rights
Book II.

The various neceſſities of mankind induced alſo the judges very ſoon to depart from the rigour and ſimplicity of the rule's of the common law, and to allow a more minute and complex conſtruction upon conveyances to uſes than upon others. Hence it was adjudged, that the uſe need not always be executed the inſtant the conveyance is made: but, if it cannot take effect at that time, the operation of the ſtatute may wait till the uſe ſhall ariſe upon ſome future contingency, to happen within a reaſonable period of time; and in the mean while the antient uſe ſhall remain in the original grantor: as, when lands are conveyed to the uſe of A and B, after a marriage ſhall be had between them[1], or to the uſe of A and his heirs till B ſhall pay him a ſum of money, and then to the uſe of B and his heirs[2]. Which doctrine, when deviſes by will were again introduced, and conſidered as equivalent in point of conſtruction to declarations of uſes, was alſo adopted in favour of executory deviſes[3]. But herein theſe, which are called contingent or ſpringing, uſes differ from an executory deviſe; in that there muſt be a perſon ſeiſed to ſuch uſes at the time when the contingency happens, elſe they can never be executed by the ſtatute; and therefore, if the eſtate of the feoffee to ſuch uſe be deſtroyed by alienation or otherwiſe, before the contingency ariſes, the uſe is deſtroyed for ever[4]: whereas by an executory deviſe the freehold itſelf is transferred to the future deviſee. And, in both theſe caſes, a fee may be limited to take effect after a fee[5], becauſe, though that was forbidden by the common law in favour of the lord's eſcheat, yet, when the legal eſtate was not extended beyond one fee-ſimple, ſuch ſubſequent uſes (after a uſe in fee) were before the ſtatute permitted to be limited in equity; and then the ſtatute executed the legal eſtate in the ſame manner as the uſe before ſubſiſted. It was alſo held that a uſe, though executed, may change from one to another by circumſtances ex poſt facto[6]; as, if A makes a feoffment

  1. 2 Roll. Abr. 791. Cro. Eliz. 439.
  2. Bro. Abr. tit. Feoff. al uſes. 30.
  3. See pag. 173.
  4. 1 Rep. 134. 138. Cro. Eliz. 439.
  5. Pollexf. 78. 10 Mod. 423.
  6. Bro. Abr. tit. Feoffm. al uſes. 30.
to