Pekao Trading Corp. v. Bragalini/Opinion of the Court
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450, 79 S.Ct. 357, 3 L.Ed.2d 421.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse