Squire v. Capoeman/Dissent Reed

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
912168Squire v. Capoeman — DissentStanley Forman Reed
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Reed

United States Supreme Court

351 U.S. 1

Squire  v.  Capoeman

 Argued: Jan. 19, 1956. --- Decided: April 23, 1956


Mr. Justice REED, dissenting.

My view is that the sale price of the timber in excess of its market value on March 1, 1913, was a capital gain, subject to federal income tax. Jones v. Taunah, 10 Cir., 186 F.2d 445. Cf. Choteau v. Burnet, 283 U.S. 691, 51 S.Ct. 598, 75 L.Ed. 1353; Superintendent of Five Civilized Tribes, etc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 295 U.S. 418, 55 S.Ct. 820, 79 L.Ed. 1517. The gain is taxable income like the value of annual crops.

Mr. Justice HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse