St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. (185 Ark. 824)

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 185 Ark. 824 (1932)
the Arkansas Supreme Court
2838333St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 185 Ark. 824 (1932)1932the Arkansas Supreme Court

Supreme Court of Arkansas

185 Ark. 824

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.  v.  Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Second Division

No. 4-2547.—Decided May 16, 1932. 

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Linked cases:
289 U.S. 76
  1. EMINENT DOMAIN—SPUR TRACK.—Under Const., art. 17, § 1, providing that "every railroad company shall have the right with its road to intersect, connect with or cross any other road," the Railroad Commission, under Crawford & Moses' Digest,. § 1643, is authorized, on application by a railroad company for, a spur track across the industrial track of another road, to fix the point and manner of the crossing without first requiring petitioner to obtain right-of-way by condemnation.
  2. RAILROADS—SPUR TRACK—CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE.—A proposed track extending from petitioner's main line to cottonseed plants to serve them directly held. a spur track within Interstate Commerce Act, authorizing constructiop of, spur tracks without obtainfng a certificate of convenience from the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Second Division; Richard M. Mann, Judge; affirmed.

Carter, Jones & Turney and Lamb & Adams, for appellant.

R. E. Wiley, for appellee.

[Opinion of the court by Justice THOMAS H. HUMPHREYS.]

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse