The Philosophical Review/Volume 1/Review: Paszkowski - Die Bedeutung der theologischen Vorstellungen für die Ethik

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Philosophical Review Volume 1 (1892)
edited by Jacob Gould Schurman
Review: Paszkowski - Die Bedeutung der theologischen Vorstellungen für die Ethik by Jacob Gould Schurman
2656367The Philosophical Review Volume 1 — Review: Paszkowski - Die Bedeutung der theologischen Vorstellungen für die Ethik1892Jacob Gould Schurman
Die Bedeutung der theologischen Vorstellungen für die Ethik. Von Dr. Wilhelm Paszkowski. Berlin, Mayer & Müller, 1891. — pp. v, 92.

This work is in the main historical, the sources being Waitz, Pfleiderer, Zeller, Réville, and the other well-known writers on the history of religion. The first part deals with those conceptions of the Godhead which in the various religions tend to produce moral conduct; the second investigates the influence of the dogmatic and ritual elements upon moral conduct.

In the nature-religions, morality and religion are not connected. They become fused with the development of civilization. The Egyptian religion introduces the conception of a moral order and righteousness which the gods maintain. A further impulse to morality was given by the elaboration at the hands of the Egyptians of the idea of future life and retribution. Brahmanism makes a systematic application of theology to life, and consequently leaves no place for morality. The Iranian peoples, on the contrary, brought religion into the service of an active morality; theirs was a religion of pure morals, a religion of struggle, of joy in activity; but like all state religions, it suffered from the enthronement of forms and ceremonies. Buddhism contains a deep moral element. In emphasizing the suffering of the world, it brings to the forefront of consciousness the duty of benevolence. Greek religion contributed less to morality than did political life. Besides, the Greeks judged everything from the aesthetic standpoint, the good being the beautiful, and the bad the ugly. Roman religion had a purely practical utilitarian tendency, and consequently contributed little to the growth of pure morality.

Passing now from polytheistic to monotheistic religions, — and Nägelsbach has observed that the search for the one God was the living pulse in the entire religious development of antiquity, — the author finds that among the people of Israel, the relation of morality to religion presents an altogether different aspect. Every moral act is religious, and ought to conform to the righteous and holy will of God. According to Mohammedanism, man derived his entire worth from his relation to Allah; but as Allah is generally conceived as an arbitrary despot, no moral significance attaches to the relation. In Christianity morality acquires its deepest foundation. The conception of a divine love embracing all humanity, taken along with the love of one's neighbor, gives every moral act a religious character.

The religious impediments to morality the author finds in superstition, asceticism, cult, and dogma. The work as a whole shows little originality, but it is an orderly and useful summary of the facts.

J. G. S.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.


The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse