The Philosophical Review/Volume 1/Summary: Angell -Untersuchung über die Schätzung von Schallintensitäten

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Philosophical Review Volume 1 (1892)
edited by Jacob Gould Schurman
Summary: Angell -Untersuchung über die Schätzung von Schallintensitäten by Anonymous
2657447The Philosophical Review Volume 1 — Summary: Angell -Untersuchung über die Schätzung von Schallintensitäten1892Anonymous
Untersuchung über die Schätzung von Schallintensitäten nach der Methode der Mitteleren Abstufungen. Von Frank Angell. Phil. Stud., VII, 3, pp. 414-468.

Author criticises the 'proportional' hypothesis of the relation of stimulus to sensation, finds there are as many forms of the hypothesis as there are advocates of it, shows that in any form it is meaningless, self-contradictory, and not capable of experimental proof, and supports the 'difference' hypothesis in the sense of a law of Apperception. Merkel's results drawn from experiments with several psycho-physical methods are not in agreement with one another, nor with any known psycho-physical law. The methods of doubled stimuli and mean gradations are tested experimentally, and the following conclusions are arrived at. 1) The method of doubled stimuli cannot be considered as of any value in psycho-physics. 2) The sources of error in the comparison of sound-intensities according to the method of mean gradations are numerous enough, when the variable stimulus is moved regularly in one direction, to obscure the actual relation of stimulus to sensation. 3) Irregular change of the variable in the method of mean gradations does not prevent a reliable comparison of differences of sound-intensities, and with this irregular change, the method is to be considered valid. 4) Freed from the disturbing influences of expectation, and stereotyped ways of judging, the comparison of broad differences of sound-intensities gives results corresponding to the requirements of Weber's law.