Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District/Dissent Harlan

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Stewart
White
Dissenting Opinions
Black
Harlan
Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg Wikipedia article
Linked case(s):
413 U.S. 15
478 U.S. 675
484 U.S. 260

United States Supreme Court

393 U.S. 503

TINKER  v.  DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

 Argued: Nov. 12, 1968. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1969

Mr. Justice HARLAN, dissenting.

I certainly agree that state public school authorities in the discharge of their responsibilities are not wholly exempt from the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment respecting the freedoms of expression and association. At the same time I am reluctant to believe that there is any disagreement between the majority and myself on the proposition that school officials should be accorded the widest authority in maintaining discipline and good order in their institutions. To translate that proposition into a workable constitutional rule, I would, in cases like this, cast upon those complaining the burden of showing that a particular school measure was motivated by other than legitimate school concerns-for example, a desire to prohibit the expression of an unpopular point of view, while permitting expression of the dominant opinion.

Finding nothing in this record which impugns the good faith of respondents in promulgating the armband regulation, I would affirm the judgment below.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).