Jump to content

Translation:Announcement of the Council for Democratic Reform No 30

From Wikisource
Announcement of the Council for Democratic Reform No 30 (2006)
Council for Democratic Reform, translated from Thai by Wikisource
Council for Democratic Reform4595059Announcement of the Council for Democratic Reform No 302006Wikisource

Volume 123Issue 105A
Page 17
Royal Gazette

3 October 2549

Announcement of the Council for Democratic Reform
No 30
Re: Scrutiny of acts causing damage to the State


Following the issuance of the Announcement of the Council for Democratic Reform No 23 dated the 24th day of September 2549 BE, Re: Scrutiny of property, the scrutiny proceedings should be improved to empower the Scrutiny Committee to scrutinise a wider range of acts causing damage to the State, for which reason the Council for Democratic Reform announces as follows:

Article1.The Announcement of the Council for Democratic Reform No 23 dated the 24th day of September 2549 BE, Re: Scrutiny of property, shall be repealed.

Article2.There shall be a Scrutiny Committee composed of—

(1) Nai Klanarong Chanthik as Member;
(2) Nai Kaewsan Atibodhi as Member;
(3) Khunying Jaruvan Maintaka as Member;
(4) Nai Chiranit Havanond as Member;
(5) Nai Nam Yimyaem as Member;
(6) Nai Banjerd Singkaneti as Member;
(7) Nai Wirot Laohaphan as Member;
(8) Nai Sawat Chotiphanit as Member;
(9) Nai Sak Kosaengruang as Member;
(10) Nang Saowani Atsawarot as Member;
(11) Nai Udom Fuangfoong as Member;
(12) Nai Amnuay Thantara as Member.

In the event that a law prohibits any person from holding a position of committee member or from performing any other duty in relation to the holding of a position, such law shall not apply to the appointment of and performance of duties by the Members of the Scrutiny Committee.

The Members of the Scrutiny Committee under paragraph 1 shall select one amongst themselves to serve as their President and shall have the power to appoint one Secretary and appoint Assistant Secretaries as necessary.

In the event that a membership in the Committee falls vacant, the remaining Members shall be able to continue their duties if they are not less than half of the total number of the Members, and the Council of Ministers shall have the power to appoint as a Member a person found appropriate to fill the vacant membership.

Article3.The State Audit Office shall be responsible for the administrative works of the Scrutiny Committee and shall perform the duties assigned by the Scrutiny Committee.

The Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, the Anti-Money Laundering Office, the Bank of Thailand, the Office of the Attorney General, and the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission shall provide cooperation by carrying out the activities requested by the Scrutiny Committee and shall supply it with information, personnel, or any other things in the interest of its performance of duties.

The Secretariat General of the Council of Ministers shall provide an appropriate office to the Scrutiny Committee, and if requested by the Scrutiny Committee, the Council of Ministers shall have the power to instruct officials from state agencies to assist in the works designated by the Scrutiny Committee.

Article4.The Budget Bureau shall allocate an amount of budget as deemed appropriate for the State Audit Office by doling it out of the money left from the expenditures of the Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission and the Office of the Election Commission, in order to cover the expenses incurred by the Scrutiny Committee in carrying out its activities. In the event that the money left does not suffice to cover the expenses, the Council of Ministers shall provide a support budget as necessary.

The remuneration for or any other expenses incurred in the performance of duties by the Members of the Scrutiny Committee, as well as the remuneration for or any other expenses incurred by the officials working for the Scrutiny Committee, shall be governed by the criteria designated by the Scrutiny Committee with the approval of the Prime Minister.

Article5.The Scrutiny Committee shall have the following powers and duties.

(1)to scrutinise the activities or projects endorsed or approved by the Council of Ministers removed from office as a result of the Democratic Reform or by its members when there are proper reasons to suspect that they might involve dishonesty or misconduct;

(2)to scrutinise contracts, concession contracts, or procurement arrangements of public entities, state enterprises, or other state agencies when there are proper reasons to suspect that they might involve acts wrongfully benefiting private entities, unlawful acts, or acts of dishonesty or misconduct;

(3)to scrutinise the administration of any public affairs by state officials or state agencies when there are proper reasons to suspect that they might involve unlawful acts or acts of dishonesty or misconduct;

(4)to scrutinise acts committed by any persons when they are found to be unlawful or to have evaded a law on taxation, thereby causing damage to the State.

In the event where it is found that reliable evidence shows dishonesty or misconduct as to a scrutinised matter and circumstances show any person related to such dishonesty or misconduct or having gained unusual wealth or unusual increase of wealth, the Scrutiny Committee shall have the power to order provisional seizure or attachment of the relevant property of such person and his or her spouse and children who have not yet attained majority.

For the purposes of the activities under this Announcement, the Scrutiny Committee shall have the powers under the following laws in addition to the powers under paragraph 1:

(1)the Act on Suppression and Prevention of Money Laundering, 2542 BE,[1] in respect of which the Scrutiny Committee shall exercise the powers of the Anti-Money Laundering Committee and the Transactional Committee;

(2)the Organic Act on Suppression and Prevention of Corruption, 2542 BE, in respect of which the Scrutiny Committee shall exercise the powers of the National Anti-Corruption Commission;

(3)the Revenue Code, in respect of which the Scrutiny Committee shall exercise the powers of the Director General of the Revenue Department only when dealing with the seizure, attachment, and auctioning of property.

In executing paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, the Scrutiny Committee shall have the power to consider any matters which it finds should be scrutinised, matters proposed by informants, or matters pending before any other agencies, and shall have the power to take files of or matters pending before other state agencies or inquiry or scrutiny files of the State Audit Office, if any, into account and use them as scrutiny files of the Scrutiny Committee, whether with or without additional inquiry. In the event that an identical matter is pending before the National Anti-Corruption Commission, Anti-Money Laundering Committee, or Transactional Committee, liaison shall be established so as to proceed with the matter as proper for the circumstances.

Article6.The Scrutiny Committee shall communicate the name of the person under article 5 to financial institutions, the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Land Department, the Revenue Department, and other relevant agencies, as well as the possessors of property, documents, or evidence related to the property of such person, and require the agencies or persons concerned to communicate to the Scrutiny Committee information about the relevant property, tax payments, and property-related transactions of the person under article 5 and his or her spouse and children who have not yet attained majority, within the time period and according to the procedure designated by the Scrutiny Committee.

In carrying out the duty under paragraph 1, the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission shall have the power to order securities companies to send information and documents to the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission to further be communicated to the Scrutiny Committee.

The provisions of law which prohibit disclosure of information related to the execution of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to the communication of information according to paragraph 1.

Article7.In the event that a person whose property has been seized or attached according to article 5 fails to communicate the information under article 6, fails to deliver the seized or attached property, or removes or disposes of the attached property, the said property shall be deemed to have been obtained wrongfully and to constitute unusual wealth or unusually increased property or to be related to the commission of an offence under the law on prevention and suppression of money laundering.

In the event that any of the agencies or persons under article 6 fails to do as required by the Scrutiny Committee according to article 6 and damage arises out of such failure, the said agency or person shall be liable for the arisen damage.

Article8.As for the property seized or attached according to article 5, if its owner successfully proves before the Scrutiny Committee within the time period designated by the Scrutiny Committee that he or she is its true owner and it has not been obtained through the commission of an offence, or is not related to unusual wealth or unusual increase of property, or has not been obtained through the commission of an offence under the law on prevention and suppression of money laundering, the Scrutiny Committee shall have the power to order revocation of its seizure or attachment.

Article9.In the event that the Scrutiny Committee passes a resolution that any holder of a political position or any person has committed an offence in office or corruption in office or has gained unusual wealth, it shall send reports, documents, and evidence, as well as an opinion, to the Attorney General in order for the Attorney General to carry out further proceedings according to the Organic Act on Criminal Procedure for Holders of Political Positions, 2542 BE, in respect of which the resolution of the Scrutiny Committee shall be deemed to be a resolution of the National Anti-Corruption Commission. In the event that the Attorney General has a different opinion but the Scrutiny Committee reaffirms its opinion, the Scrutiny Committee shall have the power to carry out proceedings for filing a motion with the Supreme Court of Justice’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions or a court competent to exercise jurisdiction over the matter, as the case may be.

In the event that the Scrutiny Committee passes a resolution that any person has breached a law and the matter is not governed by the Organic Act on Prevention and Suppression of Corruption, 2542 BE, the Scrutiny Committee shall forward the matter to a relevant agency to further be proceeded with in accordance with the law for which such agency is responsible. In this respect, the results of the scrutiny carried out by the Scrutiny Committee shall be deemed to be an inquiry under the law concerned.

Article10.In performing the duties under this Announcement, the Scrutiny Committee shall have the power to establish subcommittees to perform actions as assigned.

Article11.The Scrutiny Committee shall finish carrying out the activities under this Announcement within one year from the effective date of this Announcement.

Upon completion of the time period under paragraph 1, if the scrutiny of or inquiry into any matter is still not finished, the Scrutiny Committee shall hand its files over to the Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, the Office of the Anti-Money Laundering Committee, the State Audit Office, or other agency, as the case may be, so that the matter be further dealt with in accordance with the latter’s powers and duties.

Article12.No amendment made by this Announcement to the Announcement of the Council for Democratic Reform No 23 dated the 24th day of September 2549 Buddhist Era, Re: Scrutiny of property, shall affect anything done by the Scrutiny Committee before the effective date of this Announcement.

Announced on the 30th day of September 2549 Buddhist Era
General Sonthi Boonyaratglin
Head of the Council for Democratic Reform


  1. Typographical error for “Suppression and Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2542 BE”. (Wikisource contributor note)

 This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.

Original:

This work is in the public domain worldwide because it originated in Thailand and is a work under section 7(2) of Thailand's Copyright Act, 2537 BE (1994) (WIPO translation), which provides:

7. The following shall not be deemed copyright works under this Act:

  1. news of the day and facts having the character of mere information, not being works in the literary, scientific or artistic fields;
  2. the constitution and legislation;
  3. regulations, bylaws, notifications, orders, explanations and official correspondence of the Ministries, Departments or any other government or local units;
  4. judicial decisions, orders, decisions and official reports;
  5. translations and collections of the materials referred to in items (1) to (4), made by the Ministries, Departments or any other government or local units.

For any other work that was created or commissioned by the Thai Government, it is in the public domain if at least 50 years have elapsed since its first publication or it was not published within 50 years of authorship.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

Translation:

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.

In case this is not legally possible:

I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse