United States v. Reading Company (226 U.S. 324)

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


United States v. Reading Company
by Horace Harmon Lurton
Syllabus
849080United States v. Reading Company — SyllabusHorace Harmon Lurton
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

226 U.S. 324

United States  v.  Reading Company

 Argued: October 10 and 11, 1911. Decided ---

[Argument of Counsel from pages 324-326 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. J. C. McReynolds and G. Carroll Todd, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Attorney General Wickersham for the United States.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 326-329 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. John G. Johnson and Charles Heebner for the Reading Company et al.

Mr. Frank H. Platt for the Lehigh Valley R. Co. et al.

Messrs. Robert W. de Forest and Jackson E. Reynolds for the Central R. Co. of New Jersey et al.

Mr. William S. Jenney for the Delaware, L. & W. R. Co.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 329-331 intentionally omitted]

Mr. James H. Torrey for the Enterprise Coal Company et al.

Messrs. James H. Torrey and William S. Opdyke for the Delaware & Hudson Company.

[Argument of Counsel from page 332 intentionally omitted]

Mr. William W. Green for the Mercantile Trust Company.

Messrs. Adelbert Moot and George F. Brownell for the Erie Railroad Company et al.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 333-335 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Everett Warren for the Temple Irom Company.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 335-337 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice Lurton delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse