User talk:RazzleBeast

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Please consider putting a brief description of yourself on your user page. If you are already a contributor to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia, please mention this on your user page so we know how to contact you. Also, mention which languages you understand if English is not your first language.

In any case, I hope you enjoy donating your time to grow the Wikisource library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! John Vandenberg (chat) 02:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Scarlet Ibis[edit]

Im not 100% sure of how "{{PD-US-no-notice}}" works in the case of an article in a periodical; I expect that if the periodical issue has a copyright notice, then all works within it are considered to be copyright. My guess is that The Atlantic Monthly did have a copyright notice on the issue in question. In order to claim "no notice", you need to provide evidence of such: either scholarly articles that assert it, or actual page scans that demonstrate that the original edition didnt include a notice.

The other approach is to prove that it's copyright was not renewed by satisfying the requirements of {{PD-US-no-renewal}}. In the LOC database, I can see one entry that indicates it was renewed, in 2004.

The scarlet ibis; short story / By James R. Hurst. (In Atlantic monthly, July 1960) RE 385-387. -- Scarlet ibis; short story / By James R. Hurst. (In Atlantic monthly, July 1960) RE 385-387. -- V3514D751 -- 2004.

That appears to indicate it was renewed too late! The copyright on a 1960 work needed to be renewed 28 years later, otherwise it's copyright lapses. See w:Copyright Act of 1909. John Vandenberg (chat) 01:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So the renewal dosen't count...meaning to use {{PD-US-no-renewal}}? Ray 16:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is odd that they would try to renew it, and have a renewal given to them, unless there is some legal basis - in order to be 100% sure, I think you would need to contact the publisher and inquire what was renewed (they may not be very helpful), or ask the LOC to do a copyright search (there is a small charge for this). Alternatively, you might like to ask on our community discussion board, or on the Wikipedia Reference Desk. John Vandenberg (chat) 16:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright business gives me a headache...i'm just going to give it the copyright violation template and let it run its course. Ray 15:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I'll launch a discussion on WS:COPYVIO, and fingers crossed we work out that it is not covered by copyright. Even if it doesnt turn out to be freely available, Wikisource also collects information pertaining to the copyright status of works, so this is a useful exercise. It is better to have tried and failed, than to have never tried at all.

p.s. we have recently turned on email notifications, which allows you to automatically be notified if someone posts a message to your talk page, or modifies a page on your watchlist. In order to enable this feature, see your preferences --John Vandenberg (chat) 15:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finally! I was hunting all my peferences trying to find that option (: Ray 20:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Razzlebeast, are you a long lost relative of the [Crunchberry Beast? If so, I've been a fan of his for a while, so maybe you could swap me a bowl of Crunchberry cereal for some copyright research! ResScholar 05:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


eh? wha? confusedd? why did you post this? ~therazzlebeast [i'm not signed in]

Just to be funny. I was curious about your name and wondered if it had anything to do with the Crunchberry Beast, who I liked growing up. Sorry if you responded immediately to an alert on your e-mail and you weren't in the mood for joking inquiries. ResScholar 05:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]