Vaughn v. Board Police Commissioners City Los Angeles/Opinion of the Court
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539, 552-554, 37 S.Ct. 217, 61 L.Ed. 480, L.R.A.1917F, 514, Ann.Cas.1917C, 643; Lehman v. Board of Accountancy, 263 U.S. 394, 398, 44 S.Ct. 128, 68 L.Ed. 354; cf. Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 376-377, 33 S.Ct. 780, 57 L.Ed. 1232; (2) Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U.S. 692, 698, 11 S.Ct. 224, 34 L.Ed. 816; Bergemann v. Backer, 157 U.S. 655, 656, 15 S.Ct. 727, 39 L.Ed. 845; cf. Dohany v. Rogers, 281 U.S. 362, 369, 50 S.Ct. 299, 74 L.Ed. 904, 68 A.L.R. 434; (3) Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Slade, 216 U.S. 78, 83, 30 S.Ct. 230, 54 L.Ed. 390; Mobile, Jackson & K. C. R. Co. v. Mississippi, 210 U.S. 187, 204, 28 S.Ct. 650, 52 L.Ed. 1016.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse