Harriman National Bank v. Seldomridge

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Harriman National Bank v. Seldomridge
by Edward Douglass White
Syllabus
860940Harriman National Bank v. Seldomridge — SyllabusEdward Douglass White
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

249 U.S. 1

Harriman National Bank  v.  Seldomridge

 Argued: Jan. 31, 1919. --- Decided: March 3, 1919

Messrs. Charles E. Hughes and Henry B. Wesselman, both of New York City, for plaintiff in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 2-3 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Stuart G. Gibboney and William A. Barber, both of New York City, for defendant in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 4-6 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse