Index talk:Freud - Leonardo da Vinci, a psychosexual study of an infantile reminiscence.djvu

l. c. p. vs. 1. c. p.

In the references the author often uses an acronym to refer to previously cited work, that is “l. c. p.” I frankly don't have any idea about the possible meaning of such acronym (I'm not a native English speaking person), but I'm certain that “l. c. p.” is the exact spelling used in the book, it is not “1. c. p.” as it has been corrected for example in Page:Freud_-_Leonardo_da_Vinci,_a_psychosexual_study_of_an_infantile_reminiscence.djvu/93. This can be easily proved by comparing the glyphs for “1” and “l” used elsewhere in the book (fortunately, they are completely different one from the other). —Esponenziale (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@Esponenziale: You'll have to be more specific about where you mean. There are no references on the main page of this work, and neither is there a table of contents linking to any sections of the work, just a list of illustrations. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

I located one of the notes. It's not a single abbreviation, but a combination of two abbreviations. "l. c." is an abbbreviation of Latin loco citato (in the place cited), and the "p." stands for page (meaning the page number). --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@EncycloPetey: Thank you, I've informed User:Jasonanaggie and he has reverted his corrections. Bye —Esponenziale (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)