Page:A History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages-Volume I .pdf/362

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
342
THE INQUISITION FOUNDED.

was instructed to have them submitted to him, and if he found them objectionable the authorities were obliged to repeal or modify them. It was not the fault of the Church if a bold monarch like Philippe le Bel occasionally ventured to incur divine vengeance by protecting his subjects.[1]

Beyond the Alps there was no legal responsibility admitted, as in Italy, to defray the expenses of the Inquisition by the State. This is a subject which will be treated more fully hereafter, and meanwhile I may briefly state that royal generosity was amply sufficient to keep the organization in effective condition. Its necessary expenses were exceedingly small. The Dominican convents furnished buildings in which to hold its tribunals. The public officials were bound under royal order and the tremendous penalties involved in suspicion of heresy to render service whenever called upon. If the bishops had neglected the duty of establishing and maintaining prisons, the royal zeal had stepped in, had built them and had kept them up. In 1317 we learn that during the past eight years the king had spent the large sum of six hundred and thirty livres tournois on that of Toulouse alone, and lie also regularly paid the jailers. Besides this, the inquisitors, whenever they needed aid and counsel, were empowered to summon experts to attend them and to enforce obedience to the summons. There was no exception of dignity or station. All the learning and wisdom of the land were made subservient to the supreme duty of suppressing heresy and were placed gratuitously at the service of the Inquisition ; and any prelate who hesitated to render assistance of any kind when called upon was threatened in no gentle terms with the full force of the papal vengeance. [2]

That the powers thus conferred on the inquisitors were real and not merely theoretical we see in 1260 in the case of Capello di Chia, a powerful noble of the Roman province, who incurred the suspicion of heresy, was condemned, proscribed, and his lands confiscated. He refused to submit, when Fra Andrea, the inquisitor, called for assistance on the citizens of the neighboring town of


  1. Mag. Bull. Roman. I. 118.— C. 9 Sexto v. 1. — Zanchini Tract, de Hgeret. c. xxxi. — Cf. Eymerici Direct. Inq. p. 561. — Bernardi Comens. Lucerna Inquisit. s. v. Statutum.
  2. Bernard. Guidon. Gravam. (Doat, XXX. 107-9).— Alex. PP. IV. Bull. Cupientes, 15 Apr. 1255 ; Ejusd. Bull. Exortis in agro^ 15 Mar. 1256.