Page:A critical and exegetical commentary on Genesis (1910).djvu/221

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

son of 'Adah, is the father of all who handle lyre and pipe; the oldest and simplest musical instruments. These two occupations, representing the bright side of human existence, have 'Adah (the Dawn?) as their mother; recalling the classical association of shepherds with music (see Lenorm. i. 207).—22. Equally suggestive is the combination of Tûbal-ḳâyin, the smith, and Na'ămāh ('pleasant'), as children of the dark Ẓillah; cf. the union of Hephæstos and Aphrodite in Greek mythology (Di. al.).—The opening words of a(Symbol missingGreek characters) are corrupt. We should expect: he became the father of every artificer in brass and iron (see footnote). The persistent idea that Tubal-cain was the inventor of weapons, Ber. R., Ra. and most, which has led to a questionable interpretation of the Song, has no foundation. He is simply the metal-worker,


certainly a stringed instrument, played with the hand (1 Sa. 1623 etc.), probably the lyre (Greek (Symbol missingGreek characters)). The (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (associated with the (Symbol missingHebrew characters) in Jb. 2112 3031: elsewhere only Ps. 1504) is some kind of wind instrument (VTO),—a flute or reed-pipe, perhaps the Pan's pipe ((Symbol missingGreek characters)).—22. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] in genealogies (as here, 426 1021 1938 2220. 24 [Ju. 831]) is characteristic of J.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] G (Symbol missingGreek characters). Other Vns. have the compound name, and on the whole it is probable that (Symbol missingGreek characters) is a corruption of (Symbol missingGreek characters), although the next cl. has (Symbol missingGreek characters) alone.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] G (Symbol missingGreek characters), V qui fuit malleator et faber in cuncta opera aer. et f; S (Symbol missingSyriac characters); TO (Symbol missingHebrew characters). To get any kind of sense from MT, it is necessary either (a) to take (Symbol missingHebrew characters) ('sharpener' or 'hammerer') in the sense of 'instructor'; or (b) take (Symbol missingHebrew characters) as neut. ('a hammerer of every cutting implement of,' etc.); or (c) adopt the quaint construction (mentioned by Bu. 138): 'a hammerer of all (sorts of things),—a (successful) artificer in bronze,' etc! All these are unsatisfactory; and neither the omission of (Symbol missingHebrew characters) with G (Di.), nor the insertion of (Symbol missingHebrew characters) before it yields a tolerable text. Bu.'s emendation (139 ff.) (Symbol missingHebrew characters) [for (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] is much too drastic, and stands or falls with his utterly improbable theory that Lamech and not Tubal-cain was originally designated as the inventor of weapons. The error must lie in the words (Symbol missingHebrew characters), for which we should expect, (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (Ols. Ball). The difficulty is to account for the present text: it is easy to say that (Symbol missingHebrew characters) and (Symbol missingHebrew characters) are glosses, but there is nothing in the v. to require a gloss, and neither of these words would naturally have been used by a Heb. writer for that purpose.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] The Semitic words for 'iron' (Ass. parzillu, Aram. [Aramaic: **] (Symbol missingSyriac characters), Ar. farzil) have no Semitic etymology, and are probably borrowed from a foreign tongue. On the antiquity of iron in W. Asia, see Ridgeway, Early Age of Gr. i. 616 ff.