14. To the seers, hail!
Here also we emended the accent ⌊to ṛ́ṣibhyas, which W's D.L. indeed give⌋; but SPP. has, with the mss., ṛṣíbhyas. ⌊For the rationale of the blunder (due to çiṣíbhyas, vs. 15), of. notes to vss. 10 and 13 and note to xviii. 3. 47.⌋
15. To the peaked ones (? çikhín), hail!
Here the mss. vary between çikhíbhyas and çiṣíbhyas.
16. To the gaṇás, hail!
17. To the great gaṇás, hail!
18. To all the gaṇá-knowing (??) An̄girases, hail!
It is altogether likely that vidagaṇá either never meant anything or is a corrupt reading; the translation is given merely in order not to leave the word untranslated.
19. To the two thousands severally, hail!
20. To the bráhman (?), hail!
SPP. reads brahmáṇe, and mentions no disagreement among his authorities; all but one or two of ours have the same, and our text might probably have been better left to read so; but the accentuation of the mss. is wholly unauthoritative, and the distinction here also of no manner of importance. The comm. understands brahmáṇe. ⌊I think bráhmaṇe is to be preferred for the reason given at p. 932, line 7.⌋ Tlie numbers of syllables in the verses agree throughout with those demanded by the definitions of the Anukr.
It is a great disappointment to find that the designations given in this hymn to the various parts or elements of the Atharvan text are just as much a puzzle to the commentator as they are to us, so that he does not even venture to conjecture a meaning for them. He understands the authors rather than the mantras to be meant as the recipients of the homage. His whole comment follows: atra viṅçatikāṇḍātmikāyām asyāṁ çākhāyāṁ vidyamānānuvākasūktagaṇaviçeṣādisaṁjñārūpāiḥ çabdāir anuvākādidra. ṣṭāra etannāmāna ṛṣayaḥ pratipādyante: nīlanakhādisūktaviçeṣāṇām prasiddhatvāt tāni viçeṣato na pradarçitāni: brahmaṇe svāhe ’ti brahmaçabdena viṅçatikāṇḍātmakavedavācakena tasya draṣṭā brahmākhya ṛṣiḥ pratipādyate: anyat sarvaṁ nigadavyākhyātam. It sounds like a bad joke that he calls nīlanakha etc. 'familiarly known.' That anuvāka is used in vs. 1 in the same sense as in the present division of the text seems very unlikely.
21. Heroisms [were] gathered with the bráhman as chief; the bráhman as chief in the beginning stretched the sky; the Brahman was born as first of creatures; therefore (téna) who is fit to contend with the Brahman?