Ex?ninatien of tim Scripture texts brought for their support 105 Tmiitiom of the CorindSam "They tl? henr you, henr me?" &c. 100 Ronm? xvi, 17 101 Jo? ? 12 101 ?. ? ?m?t ? ? ? 101 4. Pat? t?ti?s ex? 101,1? 5. ?tion of the ?1 b? ?hmg ? of ?, c?m- 102, 103 IV. ?? ?t ? ? 109 1. ?e ?pt? ? ? them 103 2. ?! ?t?, in ? nature, ? ? ? ? c?ble, ? ?ot ? a role ? f? 10?1? ?. Some ?om, cl? ? be 4. ?P? ?" --h ?er, l? and to Scripture 105, 106 5. Some traditions are become oboe- leto 106 6. The Church of Rome has invented many new one8 106 7. In point of' cleame?, they present mere difflcultin than Scripture 106, 107 8. They are attended with pemiciotm effects 107 9. They o? very discordant in their sentiment] respecting tradition 107 (l.) Some make them �al to (?.) Others say they ?re inferior to Scriptur? 108' (S.) Others nmke thzm superior to Scripture 105 (4.) Dicerdent sentiments en tradition entertained by the d?vine? of Trent 108, 109 V. W/?tker, a? Protesttmt? otker? ! 110 1. Scripture doee not depend on tra- dition 110, 111 2. Nor the baptism of infants 111 & Nor the observs?nce of the Chris- 4. No? the procession of the Holy S ' 't 111 5. ?or? of bleed 6. Nor the divinity of Christ 11 VI. Of flair witte? traditio? 112] VII. 7'uaou?y of fA? ?u?e?f f?Ao.f 112 I. Pre_'hmin? tenrob Chartcter of the fathers 118[ _?Jeight of their tzstimony 113] Nm of the f?t traditiom 11? ll$J Cypri? 4. F?,r, of tte fom, t!? c,?'?Atry Pap 114 l!4 114 114-116 116-118 118, 110 119, 1?) 1?0 1?0 Hippolitus l?)? 121 Eusebiue Pml)hiliue 121 Athenasire 121 AmbM 121 Hfi? 121 ? N?n 121, f Je?em C?m 1 ?eop? ?ex? J? . A? 1?127 ? ?f ?ex?a 127 6. F?, of ?? S? 127 John ?? IBIPALLIBILITY 1?8 I. 8?eme? of ?e?r ?ue 1?8 Roman Catechism quoted 1?8 C?uncil of Florence 1?8, It is their great bo?t n. 1. CoMiders?on of the text] brousht to support it 190 (1.) Matt. xvi, 18, comidered (2.) Matt. xv?i, 17 (8.) Matt. xxviii, 20 1Be, 188 (4.) John xiv, 15, 16 188, 134 (5.) The infallibility profsesed by the apostles, confined to their own umes 134, 185 (60 I Thn. 'di, 15 185, 136 (1.) This ?rsn?n. ent would snake men the ptclgse of wtmt God ought to do 197 (2.) h would suppome that di men ,ire infallible 197 (S.) The Jewish Church had no such guide 137 (4.) According tothi? ?ument, �in must not have existed let (5.) It would suppose that an in fallible judge mu? el:bt in temporal end civil nmttem 137 (6.) S?h (7.). Norcmdd he end courtover-
�
